DISSECTING THE ZIONIST MYSTIQUE
BEHIND THE NEWS MARCH 1980
“No one must lightly dismiss the question of race. It is the key to world history and it is precisely for this reason that written history so often lacks clarity – it is written by people who do not understand stand the race question and what belongs to it. Language and religion do not make a race, only blood does that.” BENJAMIN DISRAELI
Of all the great falsehoods which combine to form the modern “world of lies”, there is none more powerful or more heavily charged with peril than that which we call “antisemitism”.
It is most dangerous at this time because it is being used with great success as a weapon of psychological warfare to prevent the people of the West from discovering that they are in the process of being railroaded into a Third World War situation. And is can be described as most powerful because it is being used and backed up with a global network of organizations aimed with seemingly unlimited resources in money and manpower.
This great lie is being used ruthlessly to suppress information and to veto all genuine debate on many issues, the most important of these being developments in the Middle East, where the setting up of the state of Israel has produced a chain reaction of the most alarming consequences for Jew and Gentile alike.
Dr. Alfred Lilienthal, the Jewish historian who sees in Zionism a great danger to the Jewish people and to the whole world, tells us how it is all done:
“At critical moments in U.S. relations with the Arab world and Israel, there has been some one person who has seen the problem in perspective, bestirred himself and attempted to tell the story to the American public. Equally invariably, like the wolf at the head of the pack, he has been forth-rightly shot down, his pen or voice stilled, and a gaping vacuum once more becomes apparent. With the help of the ever-willing media, the critic of Israel or the ‘Israel first’ policy has been made out to be the reincarnation of Hitler ….. Those who have dared to break the silence barrier have paid grievously for their courage in exercising what they considered their democratic prerogative”.
‘The Defaming of Many’
Dr. Lilienthal then lists some of the leading clerics, politicians and scholars who were viciously defamed as “anti-Semites” and in many cases destroyed for daring to “buck the tide of Jewish-Zionist nationalism”. These include Rabbi Elmer Berger; Dr. Arnold Toynbee, the famous historian; Senator J. William FulbrIght, who dared to draw attention to the irresistible Zionist influence in Congress; James Forrestal, former US Defense Secretary, who either jumped or was pushed from an upstairs hospital window; Moshe Menuhin, father of the famous violinist; Dorothy Thompson, famous columnist and author; Count Folke Bernadotte, the UN emissary, who was finally assassinated in Jerusalem; General de Gaulle; plus leading American academics like William Burrows of Yale and William Ernest Hocking of Harvard.
Dr. Lilienthal’s lengthy list of famous people who were assailed with accusations of anti-Semitism, and in many cases bludgeoned in silence, could be extended to fill pages of his book – Ernest Bevin, former British Foreign Secretary; Bertrand Russell, the liberal philosopher; Professor Arthur Keith, famous anthropologist and former president of the British association of Science; Douglas Reed, author and former European correspondent of the London TIMES; etc. etc.
For all such “offenders”, the anti-Semitic smear was like one of those little white targets pinned to the breast of a captive as he stands before a firing squad, ensuring no shots were aimed except where they will produce the most deadly effect.
The technique, as described by Dr. Lilienthal:
“Surveillance, harassment, character assassination, guilt by juxtaposition, suppression of free speech, repression of even minimal dissent – these are some of the basic techniques employed by the plethora of Zionist ‘humanitarian’, ‘defense’ and lobbying organizations in silencing any and all opposition to the Israeli state and its policies”.
Lilienthal goes on to tell us about that “plethora of organizations” that is called on to do all the dirty work:
“Leading the high-pressure, efficiently organized, continuous campaign to keep anti-Semitism in the limelight through the pursuit of alleged anti-Semites, as well as to suppress all dissent with Washington’s ‘Israel First’ policy, is the well-financed off-spring of the 130-year-old B’nai Brith, the Anti-Defamation League, which was founded in 1913. Known as the ADL, this most powerful organ is supported on most occasions by other Jewish organizations. The ADL’s earlier emphasis on stamping out genuine prejudice and bigotry gave way long ago to acts of defamation, spying and publishing spurious literary productions, motivated by support of Israel and effected by eliminating critics of Zionist tactics”.
The ADL backs up its New York City national head-quarters with an annual budget of $7.4-million (1975), 28 regional offices around the country and a professional staff of 300. Each regional office has its own board “drawn from leaders and prominent citizens in the area” – and the whole set-up in the United States is duplicated, if on a less ambitious scale, in every other country in the Western world, all, as Dr. Lilienthal tells us, exerting “enormous prejudice, often bordering blackmail”.
To informed conservatives around the world, much of what Dr. Lilienthal has to tell us is so much “old hat”, but it does make a difference, does it not, when we have it from a leading Jewish historian whose quarrel is not with his own people but with a chauvinist Zionism which now threatens to precipitate another global catastrophe.
It is not the purpose in this article to review Dr. Alfred Lilienthal’s massive book THE ZIONIST CONNECTION, but rather to concentrate attention on that “anti-Semitic” trigger word, and to try to rob it of some of its power to intimidate.
The word itself is a lie of a very special kind, representing the truth turned upside down or inside out. It is the lie in this form which meets the minimum resistance, because it most closely resembles the truth, just as the left hand glove most closely resembles the opposite, the right hand glove. Thus, what is called anti-Semitism is, in fact its exact opposite, namely anti-Gentilism.
This trick of completely inverting the truth to produce a downright lie is the distinguishing feature of Marxist dialects, which converts a ruthless conspiratorial elitism in “the dictatorship of the proletariat”, a police state into “a democracy”, war into “peace”, etc.
What upsets the Zionist leaders, as they have themselves admitted again and again, is not the fact that the gentiles, especially Christians, scorn and reject persons of Jewish descent, but rather the opposite – the readiness of the rest of mankind to receive and assimilate the Jews.
Nothing therefore, could be more typical of the prevailing Zionist sentiment that these remarks by Mr. Isi Leibler, President of the Executive Council of Australian Jews, as reported in the AUSTRALIAN JEWISH TIMES of December 30, 1979:
The principal threat to our survival is still the ever- increasing loss of numbers experienced as a result of assimilation and intermarriage.
Our problem in Australia is compounded by the fact that like most Western communities, nearly all our young people attend universities. This is to be welcomed but it also accentuates assimilatory forces, because universities have always represented a challenge to religious, ethnic and particularistic groups.
Mr. Leibler went on to urge “intensification of positive Jewish educational activity” as the best means of counteracting the acceptance and absorption of Jews by the non-Jewish community, adding: “We can take exceptional pride in the fact that well over 50 per cent of all Melbourne Jewish children of school-going age attend Jewish schools”.
A policy like this, aimed at preserving identity, in South Africa is called apartheid.
There can be no doubt that Mr. Leibler was speaking for organized Jewry worldwide, as even an occasional casual glance at Jewish newspapers and periodicals will confirm.
Dr. Joseph Kastein, one of the most famous of Jewish historians, supports this view when he remarks: “Let us remember the great teaching of our history that anti-Semitism is not a Jewish but a foreign problem” (HISTORY AND DESTINY OF THE JEWS). Louis Golding, a famous writer, says of the same: “Anti-Semitism is not a Jewish, but a foreign problem” (THE JEWISH PROBLEM).
Or, as they might have said more clearly: Choosing to live and to act as we do, we make problems for the foreigners among whom we choose to dwell. Thus a covert racist antagonism produces an overt racist response among the “foreigners” – and this is called “anti-Semitism”.
The late Sir Arthur Keith summed it up with these words: “My anthropological colleagues, under the spell of ethical ideals, have done Jews and Gentiles an ill-service by giving euphonious names to vulgar things. They have assured the Jews that they are not a race but only ‘an ethnic group’ kept together having a religion in common. They also have assured all the other Caucasian people that they are race less and that hence all the animosity which arises between Gentile and Jew is an artificially fomented form of hysteria. With the best intention in the world professional anthropologists have succeeded in hiding from the world the nature of its running sores”.
Does separation necessary imply antagonism? Here is Sir Arthur Keith’s reply to that question: “Another mark of race possessed by the Jews must be mentioned. Their conduct is regulated by a ‘dual code’; their conduct towards their fellows is based on one code (amity) and that towards all who are outside their circle on another (enmity). The use of the dual code, as we have seen, is a mark of an evolving race” (A NEW THEORY OF HUMAN EVOLUTION).
The Jewish scholar, Bernard Lazare was, therefore, only stating the obvious when he wrote: “In as much as the enemies of the Jews belonged to diverse race, as they dwelt far apart from one another, were ruled by different laws and governed by opposite principles; as they had not the same customs and different in spirit from one another, so that they could not possibly judge alike of any subject, it must needs be that the general causes of anti-Semitism have always resided in Israel itself and not in those antagonistic to it” (ANTI-SEMITISM).
Such, then, is the blinding and stupefying effect of egalitarian fanaticism that modern leftist intellectual in the West, in their eagerness to promote the egalitarian creed, have always welcomed the co-operation and even the leadership of the world’s most dedicated race separatists and race supremacists!
The racially etiolated non-Jewish intellectuals yearn for an imagined world in which all the supposed causes of antagonism and tension have been eliminated, while their Jewish comrades just as eagerly seek the ethnic disarmament of others ideal conditions for the triumph of their own group consciousness and nationalism.
As Dr. Nahum Goldman, for President of the World Zionist Congress, put it: “We are at one and the same time the most separatist and the most universalist people in the world” (THE JEWISH PARADOX); and he leaves no doubt that the separatism is for “us” and the universalism for “them” – which is just another version of the pigs’ doctrine in George Orwell’s ANIMAL FARM: “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others”.
The covert antagonism of a tightly-knot unassimilable minority has been expressed in numerable different forms, but the general effect sought is nearly always the same – that of making the “foreigners” weak in the very things that make the minority strong, confusing group consciousness and attenuating the vitality, self-confidence and will of the host population. Setting aside the question of authorship, the so-called PROTOCOLS* contain as complete a compendium of the means employed as will be found anywhere in print.
A Fraudulent Psychology
One of the major factors in this process of culture distortion, without which the rest would have been impossible, has been the falsification of all those academic disciplines which have to do with the study of man, like anthropology, psychology, ethnology, human genetics and political science. The falsification of anthropology by Franz Boas and his circle has been discussed in the January 1980 OF BEHIND THE NEWS.
There is space in this article only for a few words about the falsification of psychology, typical of all the other forms of academic falsification. This tricky subject has been handled with courage and frankness by Dr. Thomas Szasz, himself of Jewish descent, who has fully exposed the fraudulent and hostile character of the Freudian teaching, one of this century’s two most powerful intellectually formative influences – the other being, of course, Marxism.
Writes Dr. Szasz, the MYTH OF PSYCHOTHERAPY:
“The inconsistency between Freud’s passionate anti-religious tirades and his profound committal to Jewishness significantly highlights an important aspect of Freud’s personality and products, namely his anti-Gentilism”.
In a chapter headed “Freud, the Jewish Avenger”, Szasz adds: “Thus, when Freud developed his own lexicon of loathing and called it psychoanalysis and used it to smite his enemies, he did nothing new, either historically or morally … In short, Freud was neither worse nor better than other religious and political leaders who rose to ‘greatness’ over the bodies and souls of executed and execrated enemies”.
Dr. Szasz quotes two other Jewish authorities, Stanley Rothman and Phillip Isenberg, who in a book they jointly authored express the view that, “with the publication of THE INTERPRETATION OF DREAMS, Freud felt that he had weakened if not fully conquered the Catholic Church”. The same two authors are again quoted: “Is it not possible that some of the motives associated with Freud’s discovery of psychoanalysis had their sources in the same drives which led other Jews to Marxism, i.e. the desire to end marginality by undermining the bases of the dominant culture?”.
Dr. Szasz brushes aside this rhetorical question by declaring that in his view Freud was “more than partially influenced by such animus”, and that such animus influenced not only his earlier writings but all of his work. He is equally positive in his view that fear from anti-Semitic smear has made any discussion of Freud psychology by establishment academics virtually impossible.
The “anti-Semitic” incantation has been called upon to serve two quite separate purposes. It is used to bludgeon into silence any “foreign” leader or spokesman who criticizes Zionist national policies or places any obstacles in the way of their fulfilment. And it is also to frighten rank and file members of the Jewish community into closer unity and cohesion, rendering them amenable to discipline and more resistant to the allurements of assimilation.
This is very important: Overt hostility towards the Jews has itself become a factor in promoting Jewish group survival, so much so that Jewish leaders have sometimes supplied it themselves, by encouraging and even financing some of the grosser and more theatrical forms of popular antagonism which make use of Nazi-style uniforms, symbols and slogans – and even violence.
Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that fear of persecution and fear of leadership discipline today exert less influence in preserving Jewish unity and integrity than possibly ever before. The “enlightenment” ushered in by modern science which has tended to undermine all religious orthodoxies, has made no exception of Judaism.
As Bernard Lazare puta it, modern Jews “have forgotten the meaning of religious ceremonies; they have transformed rabbinical Judaism into a religion of rationalism”. What now holds the Jew to his group is “the national consciousness”, says Lazare: “he practices his faith no longer, he is irreligious, and often even an atheist, but he continues to be a Jew because he has a belief in his race”. These views he supports with quotes from other Jewish authorities.
The real cement of Jewish solidarity always was race consciousness and nationalism, but so reinforced with religious sanctions that most Jews were themselves no doubt convinced that religion itself was the source of their nationalism and not the other way about.
The World of Mammon
The transformation that has taken place in this century amounts to this: that fear has been largely replaced by appetite as the major motivational source of Zionist cohesion. Thus, modern Jews are not so much afraid of stepping out of line as they are enchanted by the prospects of personal enrichment and advancement which loyalty to the group offers.
In a Western world atomized by a spirit of bourgeois money-making and competiveness, the Jews’ own fervent unity-in-dispersion with its infinitely variable twin code of ethics is a veritable open-sesame to success in both business and the professions.
Bernard Lazare even boasts of it: “…… the Jew who, personally, is better endowed than his competitors, increases his advantage by uniting with his co-religionists….and by thus augments his powers by acting in common with his brethren”.
But, is the Jew “personally better endowed than his competitors”? Not surprisingly, Jewish leaders were stung to the quick by Boris Pasternak’s comment that it is only mediocre who find it necessary to seek advantage for themselves by banding together within a society, one of them going so far as to brand Pasternak and an “anti-Semitic Jew”!
Another enormous advantage accruing to the Jews in modern bourgeois environment, where only personal success counts, is that their own success is virtually doubled by the power of patronage as non-Jews fall over each other in their eagerness to win Jewish favor – in business, in the professions and, most significantly of all, in politics.
This examination of the phenomenon of anti-Semitism, brief as it must be, would be incomplete without some reference to the truly enormous increase in the word’s power to terrify and subdue since the end of World War II, arising out of hardships experienced before and during the war by Europe’s Jewish populations – for which all Christendom has been called upon to do penance.
Massive propaganda, pumped out through all media, especially cinema and television, has had the effect of adding to the word “anti-Semite” the appalling stench of guilt by association with the alleged destruction of six million Jews.
It would appear, however, that in using the “final solution” or “holocaust” theory as a major weapon of psychological warfare, Zionist leaders have over-played their hand, setting in motion a process of historical revision which could lead quite soon to the worldwide exposure of what one leading academic has described as “the hoax of the twentieth century” (Professor Arthur Butz, in a book of that title).
Understanding the Problem
Finally, what can the non-Jewish “foreigners” do about the “problem” which has been planted in their midst?
The first requirement, obviously, is to understand the problem and to define it correctly – which is what we have tried to do in this article, What we, the “foreigners”, need is something that only sympathetic comprehension of the problem can supply; namely, an attitude in which intelligence prevails over emotive responses.
After all, it is an attenuation of the problem and, hopefully, its final disappearance, that we want and not only an occasional discharge of the tension of resentment which only makes the problem more intractable!
Mr. Isi Leibler himself gives us the answer we seek: We must accentuate and intensify those “assimilatory forces”. What is to him the “principal threat” is to us the best hope,
The people of the West, both as nations and as individuals, have a duty to arm themselves in their minds against any dual code practiced in their midst, thereby robbing it of most of its power.
Simultaneously, however, if they are wise, they will accentuate those assimilatory forces by extending to their Jewish fellow-citizens, in all their personal contacts, unfailing courtesy, consideration and kindness – even if, for some, like Mr. Isi Leibler, a kindness that understands all would be even more offensive than the former blind prejudice and hostility.
The experience of 2000 years should surely have taught us that the problem of what the Jews call “anti-Semitism”, but which we call “anti-Gentilism”, is never going to be solved by rabble-rousing and persecution.
Meanwhile, however, we would do well never to forget that it is a chauvinist Zionist ambition that is edging mankind towards the brink of another global catastrophe, and that it’s most potent weapon is the mind-paralyzing lie of “anti-Semitism”.
*Question of “authorship” of PROTOCOLS discussed by Douglas Reed in THE GRAND DESIGN OF THE 20TH CENTURY and the CONTROVERSY OF ZION; and A.K. Chesterton in THE BBC AND THE LEARNED ELDERS.
At the present time, the whole wide world is under the spell of ideas which are fundamentally incompatible with the Christian Gospel. In spite of this, they have been absorbed by millions of Christian people, because they bear a surface resemblance to certain important consequences of faith. W.D. CHALMERS – he Conspiracy of Truth.
For it is the day of the Lord’s vengeance and the year of recompenses for the controversy of Zion. Isaiah 34:8