EQUALITARIANISM – DESTROYER OF THE
WHITE RACE AND NATIONS
SPOTLIGHT ON SMEAR TECHNIQUES OF THE LEFT
THE SOUTH AFRICAN OBSERVER SEPTEMBER, 1972
EDITOR S.E.D. BROWN
WESTERN MAN is everywhere being stampeded and over-whelmed by the smear techniques and terms of the Left.
These are evocative terms, expertly designed to crackle with danger and to trigger off reactions of hate and fear.
They are part and parcel of the propaganda and psychological warfare of the Left, by means of which millions of people are being intimidated, controlled and, like Pavlov’s dogs, made prisoners of their own induced fears.
“Racist” is one of the worst terms. It is not defined so that the victim may disagree or defend himself. It is so hurled, as an accusation of some vicious crime, that it presumes automatic condemnation without trial.
Correct, a racist means a person who approves his own race, maintain his racial self-respect, and prefers to live in the society of his own people, according to his own culture and way of life – all of which implies no hostility to any other race. Millions of human beings of all races, in fact most of humanity, are racist by that definition.
Yet what do we find today?
The true racist is being smeared and persecuted by the propaganda of the Left, for no other reason than that he still has the courage openly to approve his own race and is determined to maintain his own racial and national integrity, in the face of the collective assault from the Left.
SMEAR OF ANTI-SEMITISM
Another vicious smear of the Left, perhaps the most effective and deadly in its arsenal, is that of “anti-Semitism”.
This too, is so spat out by the Left, even in print, as an accusation of a most heinous crime, that the victim is again automatically and immediately placed right beyond the pale.
This smear is grounded on the false assumption, now accepted as almost axiomatic, that the powerful Jewish minorities in all the countries of the West are entitled to special immunity from fair criticism and fair opposition of any kind. The very term minority has come to denote a small, helpless and, above all, an absolutely inoffensive element of human being!
And it was because of this “special immunity” which is assiduously fostered by the Left, that we were immediately of “anti-Semitism” when, in our reasoned editorial in the August issue of the “South n destroy the concepts of race and nation among the people of the West, but not those of the unassimilable minorities in their midst; and secondly that those in the forefront of the drive to abolish race consciousness and to impose equalitarianism on the world, including South Africa, are those who themselves live by a code of the most rigid racial, national and religious exclusiveness.
We also found it necessary to point out that their ant-racism, imposed with the fervor of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages is serving to break down the racial dynamism of Western peoples, while at the same time reinforcing and building up their own minority racism – to the point that Jewish publicists today describe their own people as a master race innately equipped with an intellectual apparatus making them superior to all other races and peoples!
‘MOST VICIOUS, BLATANT OUTBURST’
The “Pretoria News” on its front page on August 7 represented our article as one of the “most vicious and blatant outbursts of anti-Semitism ever to appear in South Africa.”
Obviously, the editor of this newspaper was acting on the assumption that open enquiry or discussion of any aspect of Jewish political activity was taboo, automatically making any inquirer after truth guilty of the crime of “anti-Semitism”.
No definition of the terms was offered, and the editor of this Oppenheimer-controlled Argus newspaper would have been hard put to furnish one. What he needed to be told was that although controversy has been strangled into unconsciousness it is not yet altogether dead.
He also needed telling that it is the height of hypocrisy to pretend that Jewish participation in “multiracial” and “nonracial” politics does not constitute a serious problem, now and in the future; and that it is, furthermore, the extreme folly of falsehood to use the “anti-Semitic” label to prevent open discussion of a question which is increasing in political importance and clamoring to be decided – now that Jews in South Africa, like their co-racials in other Western countries, are taking leading and increasingly more open roles in promoting equalitarian doctrine which threaten to undermine and destroy the foundations and very fabric of Western nations.
SIDE-STEPPING THE ISSUE
In his zeal to plaster the “South African Observer” with “anti-Semitism”, the editor of the
“Pretoria News” quite forgot to spit out the other two deadly smears of the Left, namely “Nazi” and “fascist”. What he didn’t fail to bring up, however, was the subject of the “Six Million”, as if the mention of any aspect of the Jewish problem by anyone implied some complicity in the matter. (We don’t know what this editor tells his children when they ask: “What did you do in in the last war, daddy?” Our children know that we served in the South African Forces.)
The chairman of the Pretoria Jewish Community Council, Mr. Arnold Kirsch, was allowed to “Lash Back at S.E.D. Brown”, on the front page of the “Pretoria News” by saying that “the Jewish ethic was one of understanding and compassion for the oppressed” and that “Mr. Brown’s dismissal of the greatest tragedy in the annals of modern society, namely the extermination of six million Jews in Europe (as well as a number of non-Jews), highlights his complete ignorance or denial of the fundamental facts of history.”
But what the editor and Mr. Kirsch literally failed, or perhaps refused, to understand was that our article had nothing whatever to do with “anti-Semitism” or the question of the “Six Million”, but it had everything to do with the race problem, and was an attempt on our part to get to the heart of the problem, and to help strip away some of the fraud and the hypocrisy with which the subject is enshrouded.
TRAGEDIES OF MODERN WORLD
Had we been dealing with the tragedies of the modern world and with the subject of inhumanity to man, our condemnation would not have been as selective as that of the Left, whose moral indignation has been reserved strictly for one country only.
As a public and a timely service, we would also have focused attention on all the other atrocities and tragedies of the modern world, with members of the Left have always done their best to conceal and who, when confronted by all the undeniable and indescribable suffering of the boundless millions of other decent and innocent human beings, are as dry of pity as a Gila monster scuttling among the cacti of eternal desolation.
In the Soviet Union and Red China alone, at least 90-million poor wretches have been savagely tortured, slaughtered and starved to death to build the socialist paradises, and millions more will continue to die to maintain these and other havens of equality and brotherhood being set up throughout the world.
Any survey of atrocities undertaken by us would also have included those in Algeria, Tibet, Angola, the Congo, the Sudan, Nigeria, Rwanda-Urundi, Zanzibar, Pakistan, Cuba and elsewhere, including Israel (whose treatment of the Arabs in 1947 was incidentally described by D. Arnold Toynbee, a life-long friend of world Jewry as “morally” comparable to the Nazi extermination of the Jews”).
CALLED FOR REASONED REPLY
We have no interest in “anti-Semitism”, nor are we in the least intimidated by the smear.
Our fundamental concern in the question of Race is the same as that of the mass of plain men throughout the world who wish to see the problem settled in the open upon natural, final and rational lines.
And it was precisely because we believe in the concepts of race and nation, as firmly and passionately as do the Jews believe in their own race and nation – and because of the increasing threat to our survival as a White nation that is being posed by their identification with the politics of integration and complete equality with Blacks and other non-Whites in South Africa – that we attempted in our August editorial to probe the amazing contradiction that those in the forefront of breaking down racial discrimination are the one race who really know how to discriminate and do so.
But instead of a reasoned reply to our article from leaders of South Africa Jewry, we were immediately assailed by the smear techniques of the Left.
To seek and accept facts bearing on a problem is moral, but to promote programmes and to preach conclusions on vital matters without seeking and evaluating facts is immoral.
Intellectual dishonesty is fundamental immorality.
Denial that racial differences do exist and denial that serious harm can result from racial integration and hybridization is clearly intellectual dishonesty, no matter how liberals, multi-racialists, non-racialists, internationalists and communists might dress up that denial in the rhetoric of brotherhood and humanitarianism.
It is sheer intellectual dishonesty to ignore such basic laws of God as genetics (generation and heredity); of facts revealed by anthropology and ethnology (study of mankind’s development); and the lessons of history. For, if they were familiar with the laws of Life and Nature, which, after all, are Divine Laws, they could not honestly advocate doctrines which, they should know, would have ruinous biological, sociological and political results.
INSTRUMENT OF DESTRUCTION
To ignore the potent forces of race, nation, family and the immense powers of tradition, history, civilization and religion, is to make oneself guilty not only of intellectual dishonesty of the worst kind, but of the sheerest folly. For in so doing, one becomes an instrument of destruction of the peoples and nations of the world.
The golden rule, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”, would obviously apply not only to the White peoples, but also to the Black, Brown and Yellow peoples of the world. It would also apply to their posterity. It certainly calls for racial self-respect on the part of all peoples and respect for one another’s societies.
But it certainly does not call on any of them to integrate and make racial hybrids of their posterity and to destroy themselves and their nations and traditions in the process.
WARP AND WOOF OF COMMUNISM
The problem of race cannot be solved by means of the currently fashionable, but spurious, doctrines of equalitarianism, manifesting themselves everywhere in popular clichés such as: “All men are brothers under the skin”; “People differ in ability as individuals not as races”; “All men are equal, irrespective of race, color or creed”; “There are no ineradicable differences between the races”; and all the other liberal-communist jargon which is flooding and demoralizing the world.
This subversive doctrine does not have its roots in Life, nor in historical Christianity as the “Christian” modernists would have us believe. It springs directly from Communist ideology, based on the false theory that hereditary characteristics can be changed merely by changing the environment. It is the warp and woof of Communism to say that to unmask equalitarianism is to knock the bottom out of both communism and liberalism.
This in short, is the spurious doctrine which under the protective coloration of brotherhood and a professed love and compassion for all mankind, is paralyzing the will and instinct of Western man to stand up for his racial and national integrity, and which is undermining the foundations and destroying the very fabric of Western civilization.
It is this equalitarian dogma, too, which has reduced the life-important question of segregation and the development of races and nations to an issue of “racism” and “racial prejudice”.
In truth, however, the question is fundamentally one of the right of all peoples – White, Brown, Yellow specific civilization.
Race consciousness, it must be emphasized, is not race prejudice. It is not intolerance. It is the deeply ingrained awareness of a birthright held in trust for posterity.
WHITES GUILT-RIDDEN AND BEMUSED
Everywhere one sees Western man guilt-ridden and bemused by the smear technique of the Left.
Everywhere one sees the mass media saturating the public with the scientific fraud of equalitarianism, whose aim is not compassion, or the search for truth but the hybridization and collectivization of all mankind.
And everywhere we see the amazing and quite unbelievable paradox: that the most active promoters of equalitarianism and the most vociferous of the anti-racist are the very people who them-selves live by a code of rigid racial, national and religious exclusiveness!
INVERSIONS AND TRAVESTIES
And what of the future?
Anyone who has studied the background, origins and motives of equalitarian dogma, must know that if domestic, foreign and world policies continue to be based on such inversion and travesties of the truth as this dogma, then little hope remains for the survival of the White man, his nations and his civilization, let alone for any stability or peace in the world of the future.