Chinese Elites and General Public Openly Discuss Jewish Power, Holocaust Realism
(The Irish Savant) Mon, Apr 29, 2019
All right-minded people will be saddened to learn that the growing scourge of anti-Semitism has now spread to China. One Jewish writer says:
I live in China, and in the last few weeks I’ve been alarmed at the amount of antisemitic propaganda being published by Baidu News. Baidu is China’s equivalent of Google, so it reaches a truly enormous readership, and is state owned.
He goes on to cite two reports, one of which essentially denies that the Holocaust happened, and claims that the number of Jews really killed numbered only in the “tens of thousands.” Another article claims, wait for it, that, “The Jews themselves have responsibility for the Holocaust for being too greedy and self-interested. The truth is that Hitler never slaughtered the Jews. Hitler broke the financial dragon egg in order to establish the values of labor. He did indeed shoot a few financial oligarchs, but did not massacre the Jews.”
>All right-minded people will be saddened to learn that the growing scourge of anti-Semitism has now spread to China. One Jewish writer says ‘I live in China, and in the last few weeks I’ve been alarmed at the amount of antisemitic propaganda being published by Baidu News. Baidu is China’s equivalent of Google, so it reaches a truly enormous readership, and is state owned.’ He goes on to cite two reports, one of which essentially denies that the Holocaust happened, and claims that the number of Jews really killed numbered only in the “tens of thousands.” Another article claims, wait for it, that ‘the Jews themselves have responsibility for the Holocaust for being too greedy and self-interested. The truth is that Hitler never slaughtered the Jews. Hitler broke the financial dragon egg in order to establish the values of labor. He did indeed shoot a few financial oligarchs, but did not massacre the Jews.
Jared Taylor Deported From Europe
Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, March 29, 2019
I have been banned from Europe and will be deported tomorrow.
March 29, 2019, Zurich
Dear Friends in Stockholm, Turku, and around the world,
I am sorry to have to tell you that I cannot attend the Scandza Forum in Stockholm or the Awakening Conference in Turku, Finland, where I had been invited to give talks. Today, when I landed in Zurich for a connecting flight to Stockholm, Swiss border authorities told me I have been banned from Europe until 2021. I will spend the night at the airport, and tomorrow I will be deported.
The officer at passport control in Zurich airport had already stamped my passport and waved me through to my Stockholm flight when she called after me to come back. She stared at her computer screen and told me I had to wait. She didn’t say why. In a few minutes, a policeman arrived and told me there was an order from Poland that barred me from all 26 countries in the Schengen Zone.
He said the Poles did not give a reason for the ban, and he asked me what I had done. I said I give talks on immigration, and someone in Poland must not like them. “That makes me a political criminal,” I said.
The officer took me to an interrogation room and asked me about my travel plans. He went off to another room for a while and came back with a form for me to sign, saying that I understood I had been denied entry and was being sent back to the United States. After some more waiting, he fingerprinted me and took my photograph.
He then turned me over to a man in civilian clothes, who took me to a spare, dormitory-like accommodation where I will spend the night. It’s not a jail. People pay the equivalent of $40 to spend the night here if they miss a flight. I am free to walk around the terminal, I can make phone calls and use the internet, and I have a meal voucher that is supposed to last me for the next 12 hours. The officer kept my passport, though, and won’t give it back to me until I board the flight home.
Why did Poland ban me? Last September, I gave a few talks to nationalist groups in Warsaw. The talks went well, so when I was invited to Lithuania and Estonia in February to speak at conferences, I went back to Poland and spoke in Lublin and Warsaw. Attendance was by invitation only, but the Polish police learned about the meetings. They told the organizer that if I broke any Polish hate speech laws, he would be held responsible. They said I was “spreading a totalitarian ideology.”
In both cities, we switched venues for the talks rather than risk having the police show up. The talks were a success, and in Warsaw I also gave two television interviews. I left Poland by plane and assumed the matter was closed; clearly, it wasn’t. My Polish friends say they will try to find out the reason for the ban and try to appeal it.
But what are the Poles thinking? I’m not like Lenin and Trotsky meeting in Paris, plotting to uproot the entire West. I want to keep Poland as it is, the proud and eternal homeland of the Polish people. What I hope for Poland is what a huge majority of Polish people want, and is not much different from the policies of the regime. I am not a danger to Poland; I am its friend, its devoted admirer.
Three years ago, I got a letter from Theresa May, when she was still home secretary. She told me that my views are repugnant and that she had decided to keep me out of her country. Britain is the land of my ancestors, my language, my favorite authors—and now I was an exile. It was a bitter blow.
Just a few minutes ago, I used my meal voucher at the “Montreux Jazz Lounge” in Terminal E. I watched people eating and talking and laughing, and I envied them. They can come and go as they please. Terminal E is a modern, soulless place, but it is still Europe. It is part of that culture, heritage, and people that I love with a desperate, yearning love—to which I have devoted my life—and from which I am banned.
You and I, working together with our European brothers and sisters, we will save Europe. We will save it from every threat from every corner of the world. But our first and hardest task is to save it from itself.
GROUND ZERO FOR FOOD ON THE TABLE: WHO GOES TO BED HUNGRY EVERY NIGHT, AND WHY
“The consequences of so many people going to bed without a proper meal are manifold”, said TAU SA General Manager Bennie van Zyl, keynote speaker at a recent international conference on agriculture in Cape Town sponsored by Agri-Food-Aqua of London, England.
The question of food on the table has become urgent and contentious – 815 million people regularly go to bed hungry, while millions more are under-nourished and stunted, victims of the circle of poverty and malnutrition from which they are unable to escape.
A report from the United Nations food agencies – “The State of Food Security and Food Nutrition in the World 2017” – released by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Food Program (WFP) and the International Fund for Agricultural Development – says that despite overall improvements in food security, some areas of the world are lagging in providing adequate nutrition for healthy development. Some pertinent facts about this phenomenon are:
The vast majority of the world’s hungry people live in developing countries where 12,9 percent of the populations are under-nourished.
Asia is the continent with the most hungry people – two thirds of the total.
Sub-Saharan Africa is the region where the highest prevalence (percentage of population) of hunger exists, where one person in four is under-nourished.
Poor nutrition causes nearly half (45%) of deaths in children under five – 3.1 million children each year.
One out of six children – roughly 100 million – in developing countries is underweight.
One in four of the world’s children is stunted: in developing countries the proportion can rise to one out of three.
66 million primary school-age children attend classes in a state of hunger across the developing world, with 23 million in Africa alone.
WFP calculates that US$3.2 billion is needed per year to reach all 66 million hungry school-age children.
Exacerbating the already chronic hunger and stunting situation is population growth. Over the past eight years, the world’s population has grown from just under 7 billion to 7,6 billion. Urban populations during this period have grown from 3,5 billion to 4,1 billion. By 2050, the world population is predicted to be nearly 9,7 billion. (Source: Worldometers – www.worldometers.info)
Add to this mix climate change, political unrest, illegal immigration, pollution of our natural resources and politicians more interested in maintaining their power at the next election, and we have a toxic fusion that imparts little confidence in the future of mankind.
More to the point is why there is such disparity in the ability of the various peoples to feed themselves. Much has to do with cultural differences and the way in which citizens and governments of countries accept responsibility for their own future. The resulting reality is that we need different plans for different nations. Some nations are creative and build for the future, while others have a consumer culture. They use but they don’t create.
The role of government is crucial to improving on these current dire circumstances so that prosperity rather than poverty will be the modus vivendi of nations. Two important elements must exist for prosperity to replace poverty, and these elements are man-made and are the responsibility of governments:
The security and safety of the citizenry
The establishment of a government policy environment conducive to establishing confidence so that entrepreneurs and investors will be encouraged to create businesses for the future of the country and for themselves. One corollary of this is jobs. Government policies are thus at the very core of a country’s growth, prosperity and sustainability.
What happens when governments do not walk this path? This sobering reality exists throughout the world. Corruption, self-enrichment and the obsession with maintaining power at any cost are the antithesis of growth and success. Another golden thread apparent within these countries is blaming everyone but themselves for their shortcomings. Thus the buck stops nowhere.
Political instability, weak and even non-existent food and agricultural policies, indecisive conservation practices, war and conflicts: all are man-made and have caused immense devastation. Add to this climate change and its corollary unstable weather patterns, drought, hurricanes, cyclones, landslides, soil erosion and over-grazing and there appears to be a very slim chance that the world will recover. Other side effects such as disease and water pollution sentence millions to the afore-mentioned circle of poverty.
POLICY ENVIRONMENT IS CRUCIAL FOR FOOD SECURITY
We hear soothing words from political platforms, particularly about the sustainability of agricultural production, but in many countries, actions don’t match the speeches. They have deviated from the principles that ensure food sustainability and live in a world of ideologically-driven platitudes. The results are embarrassingly evident, but these politicians seem not to notice. They are focused on the next election. Rational thinking is a rarity.
A country’s agricultural policy should be based on economic principles and the need to provide food for the population. These principles should remain immutable regardless of the government in power. In the South African context, this has not happened and the results are catastrophic. Between mass starvation and food for 53 million people are a few commercial farmers whose tenure is unstable due to antagonistic government policies, crime and counter-productive legislation. The government seems to have lost the plot in this crucial arena.
Farming expertise is vital for successful commercial farming. Cultural differences are important: the Western approach of accepting responsibility and adopting a sense of urgency (tomorrow may be too late!) is embedded in Western thinking. This is why SA’s commercial farmers can produce what they do. They can think independently and most importantly, they have a passion for what they do.
They hold the key to South Africa maintaining “food on the table”, and their disappearance will mean a Zimbabwe/Venezuela scenario for South Africa.
White Nation: Genocide against Whites
Highest rape crime
Germany Rises as ‘Eurostan’ Looms Closer
By Dr Lasha Darkmoon
First published on The Occidental Observer
The new ‘Eurostan’ in the making:
Countries impacted by the migrant crisis
The writing is on the wall. The old Germany of our Christian ancestors is in the process of being destroyed. And after Germany, Europe is the target.
The EU, as we all know who have eyes to see, has now become the United States of Europe in all but name — an undemocratic and despotic confederation of states without borders whose primary aim appears to be White Genocide, i.e., the slow and systematic destruction of the white indigenous people of Europe by means of uncontrolled mass immigration and mongrelization.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has been the main force behind the ongoing destruction of the Europe of our ancestors, the Europe of traditional values firmly rooted in its Christian ethos.
Under Angela Merkel’s auspices, Germany has heard its death knell. It has seen its great cities with their shimmering spires, and its peaceful towns and villages nestling in the green countryside, invaded by well over a million uninvited guests from lawless lands who have turned their nation into a multicultural zoo. German women are being raped and sexually assaulted literally every day of the year by migrants. And still Frau Merkel sits there smiling complacently amid the ruins of her country, making no attempt to turn back the tides of mounting terror.
— § —
Domestic unrest is now the default condition in contemporary Germany. Take the recent events in Chemnitz, a city in Saxony (pop: 246,000) and formerly a part of East Germany. For a city of this small size, its ethnic population is disproportionately large and unassimilated, giving rise to frequent inter-racial tensions. The Muslim sector is the largest. By December 2017, the city contained 2,875 Syrians, 1,165 Afghans, and 1,115 Indians (although the Indians are not necessarily Muslim). Apart from these, the city housed roughly 1,200 Chinese immigrants and and a slightly smaller number of Russians. (See here, demography).
Neither the Chinese nor Russians in Chemnitz have been a thorn in the flesh to the local German population. It is a different story with the Muslims, the principal troublemakers—for reasons not altogether clear to this writer, given that most of the Muslims I have personally met have been exemplary citizens. Be that as it may, the official figures given above are almost certain to be an underestimate, since they do not cover the large number illegal immigrants who contribute so disproportionately to crime figures.
In order to counter all these new threats to the indigenous population—who appear to suffer from this infuriating tendency of wanting to live among their own kind in a relatively well-ordered and peaceful society—a hard core of resistance has naturally developed. This survival mechanism of resistance to large numbers of uncouth and unruly foreigners in their midst, all seen as potentially dangerous, is described in the mainstream media as “xenophobia” and “racism”.
Listen to Wikipedia, that paragon of authoritative respectability:
In late August of 2018 the city [Chemnitz] was the site of a series of far-right and Neo-Nazi protests that attracted at least 8,000 people, that escalated into riots. The protests started after two immigrants were arrested in connection with the murder of a 35-year-old Cuban-German man. They culminated in the formation of mobs who rampaged through the streets of Chemnitz. Violent clashes occurred between far right protesters and counter protesters, leading to injuries. The mobs outnumbered the local police presence and chased down dark skinned bystanders and those that appeared to be foreigners on the streets before more police arrived and intervened. The riots were were widely condemned throughout Germany, which “were described as reminiscent of civil war and Nazi pogroms.”
You get the message? Resistance to “dark-skinned foreigners” who have invaded your country, many under the guise of being desperate refugees on the run, is “reminiscent of Nazi Germany”.
Hear Angela Merkel: “What we have seen in Chemnitz is something which has no place in a constitutional democracy.”
Democracy? In Germany? Did Merkel consult her fellow Germans before she decided to throw open the gates of Europe in general, and Germany in particular, to millions of potentially dangerous immigrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East? No, she didn’t. She just went ahead and did it. Without consultation. Over 1.6 million migrants were allowed into Germany in one year alone (2016). And this doesn’t include illegal immigrants.
In the words of Daily Mail columnist Robert Hardman:
All over Germany and across the political spectrum, millions are pointing the finger of blame at Mrs Merkel. They cite her decision in 2015 to open her nation’s doors to all-comers, regardless of need or motive. As a result, 1.6 million migrants made their way into the EU courtesy of the people-smuggling gangs on Europe’s eastern borders.
The Chancellor neither asked her nation nor the rest of the EU before making a decision that has caused profound divisions across German society.
For a while, Mrs Merkel was the toast of enlightened opinion-formers everywhere. Come December 2015, Time magazine named her its Person of the Year for “asking more of her country than most politicians would dare”. Within days, that award had backfired. Millions of Germans were shocked by alarming stories of young women being molested during New Year’s Eve celebrations in Cologne.
Initially, the authorities had tried to bury the story, talking of a few isolated incidents. Finally, the German media exposed the truth: up to 1,200 women had reported being sexually assaulted by around 2,000 men right across Germany. Half of the suspects turned out to be new arrivals.
As a result, Mrs Merkel’s reputation and that of her party has been taking a pounding ever since. As one AfD MP, Markus Frohnmaier, put it: “If the state is no longer able to protect its citizens, then people take to the streets and protect themselves. It’s as simple as that!”
(See here, ellipses omitted)
The man murdered in Chemnitz by two fake Syrian “refugees” was stabbed 25 times “as a result of the illegal mass invasion of Germany planned by Angela Merkel”, according to leading Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) state parliamentarian Dr. Christian Blex.
Speaking in an interview with Sputnik news service, Dr Blex had this to say about the murdered man: “He’s dead because Merkel opened the borders in 2015 and let in hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants. So, he is sadly a victim of Merkel’s policies and we are not going to tolerate this anymore.”
He added forcefully:
“Merkel simply broke the law when she opened the borders in 2015 and that’s what more and more Germans are recognizing. We don’t have any borders with a country which is in state of war or persecution, so they don’t have the right to stay in Germany.
In German society we are not used to stabbing, this is not our manner to discuss situations. We are a civilized people and we didn’t have these incidents before the opening of the borders.
Asked what the solution to the problem was, Blex said “It’s simple. We have to arrange the return of these hundreds of thousands of so-called ‘refugees.’ But as long as Merkel is in power, it won’t happen, because she has a plan to transform Germany into a multiethnic society at all costs.
But with every raped woman and murdered person, the number of Merkel’s followers here in Germany is falling. It’s only a matter of time before the worst politician of the German post-war era [Angela Merkel] is removed from office.”
John Stossel: Leaving the left
By JOHN STOSSEL
September 26. 2018 11:51PM
WATCHING THIS VIDEO upset me. Students and even faculty members won’t let Dave Rubin speak. They constantly interrupt, shouting “hate speech!” and “black lives matter!”
Rubin was once a man of the left. He even was a co-host on The Young Turks network.
But then he started a podcast.
He did long interviews with people like talk show host Larry Elder. In that interview, Rubin referred to “systemic racism” and said that “cops are more willing to shoot if the perpetrator is black.”
“What’s your data for that?” replied Elder. Then he gave Rubin answers the left doesn’t like to hear, like, “Seventy percent of homicides are black-on-black…” and “The idea that a racist white cop shooting black people is a peril to black people is complete and total b.s.”
“He just beat me with fact over fact about how systemic racism doesn’t exist — not that racism doesn’t exist,” Rubin told me.
The more people Rubin interviewed, the more he became convinced something was missing in the left’s picture of the world.
“I realized not everyone that (the left) disagreed with could be a racist and a bigot and a homophobe and a sexist. That was the argument constantly being laid out. If a Republican gave a speech and said, ‘We should lower taxes,’ their answer was, ‘he’s racist’. Now that actually makes no sense.”
Rubin now considers himself a classical liberal. That means he believes in liberalism roughly as it was before today’s liberals added big government to the philosophy and subtracted belief in individual freedom.
“If you believe in the individual, then you fundamentally understand that individuals are different, so you are willing to sit down with someone different than you,” says Rubin.
He still disagrees with conservatives about many things — he’s a married gay man who is pro-pot and pro-criminal justice reform. But he found that conservatives are willing to debate those topics. “For all the differences that we have — I’m pro-choice; most of them are pro-life. I’m against the death penalty; most of them are for the death penalty — they’re all willing to sit down and discuss ideas.”
Some of his podcasts last one or more hours. I never thought people would be interested in such long interviews, but I was wrong. Millions listen and watch his YouTube videos.
“I didn’t know what was going to happen, but I started doing these long-form interviews, and people kept watching. Suddenly, I realized, ‘Whoa, there’re a lot of people thinking the things that I’m thinking.’”
Today, his former left-wing colleagues hate him.
“He’s a puppet for the right wing,” said Ana Kasparian on Rubin’s old Young Turks network. “He was lazy when he worked here. He’s lazy now with his ridiculous show.”
To me, she sounded jealous.
“I lose friends now,” says Rubin. “This goes to the laziness of the argument of the left. They truly believe that if you disagree, you’re evil.”
Many on the left have also come to believe that words themselves are a form of violence, so some now said Rubin’s words must not be heard.
As he tried to speak at the University of New Hampshire, a women’s studies professor screamed, “We don’t want you in the LGBT community, so get the f— out!”
“It’s an oppression Olympics,” Rubin told me. “The more marginalized you claim to be, the more political clout you have on campus or in left-wing circles… If you have a limp, you’re this much oppressed; if you’re a Jew, this much oppressed; Muslim, this much oppressed. Everyone wants to be oppressed.”
Of course, many minorities have suffered genuine oppression. Rubin acknowledges that but says the left misses what’s special about America.
“No society’s perfect, but the United States, by and large, has given more freedom to more people from every walk of life, regardless of your skin color, your sexuality… Do we have problems? Yes.
“We can talk about those things, but to tell me those are because you are ‘oppressed’?! It ain’t true. And that idea needs to be decimated.”
John Stossel is author of “No They Can’t! Why Government Fails — But Individuals Succeed.
Original article posted on: http://www.unionleader.com/article/20180927/OPINION02/180929571/1004/opinion
President Trump: The FBI / DOJ deep state is “a cancer in our country” … and the tumor must be excised to save America
By JD Heyes
Despite the protestations and declarations of the far-Left political chattering class of Democrats, it’s obvious that POTUS Donald Trump is not only a patriot but a president who really does want to “drain the D.C. swamp” and give Americans back their government.
Of course, he’s been fought every step of the way, by the Deep State, by leftover Obama operatives, by the disgustingly dishonest “mainstream” media, by the political establishment (which, sadly, includes too many RINO Republicans), and by his own Executive Branch bureaucracy.
On that note, the president talked this week about the challenges he’s faced, as well as the level of corruption inherent in an FBI and Justice Department that was used as a political weapon by his predecessor, and which remains a den of inequity and deceit even today, thanks in large part to the fact that the man he appointed to attorney general has been AWOL when he’s needed him most. And worse, he’s AWOL by choice.
In an interview with The Hill, POTUS Trump – who’s been critical of AG Jeff Sessions since the former Alabama senator recused himself from all things ‘Russia’ shortly after he was appointed – lambasted the FBI and Justice Department for corruption, but also Sessions for taking himself out of the game and leaving the White House without its most important legal ally.
“I don’t have an attorney general. It’s very sad,” said the president, whose frustration with Sessions goes much deeper than just the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller, who was named by Sessions’ deputy, Rod Rosenstein.
“I’m not happy at the border, I’m not happy with numerous things, not just this,” POTUS noted.
As for the situation along the border, Sessions’ Justice Department has been using whatever legal tools are available to it to push back against states and cities that have declared themselves “sanctuaries” for illegal aliens– the adoption of policies that all but forbid local police from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agents.
POTUS could also be frustrated with the alarmingly high number of migrants still attempting to cross illegally into the country, though some of that blame could go to the Department of Homeland Security, technically speaking.
No need for recusal
“I’m so sad over Jeff Sessions because he came to me. He was the first senator that endorsed me. And he wanted to be attorney general, and I didn’t see it,” he said, noting that he had a blind spot when it came to Sessions’ appointment. (Related: Jeff Sessions is not serving up the justice that Trump and the American people deserve on Comey, Clinton, and others.)
“And then he went through the nominating process and he did very poorly,” the president continued. “I mean, he was mixed up and confused, and people that worked with him for, you know, a long time in the Senate were not nice to him, but he was giving very confusing answers. Answers that should have been easily answered. And that was a rough time for him.”
The Hill reported:
Sessions recused himself under pressure from congressional Democrats and after some Republicans said he should not take part in overseeing the Russian investigation at Justice. During his confirmation hearings, he failed to mention two meetings with Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak.
When he announced his recusal in March 2017, Sessions said he had spoken with the Justice Department regarding the decision, adding that he hadn’t tried to mislead senators regarding his meetings with Kislyak – which occurred when he was a sitting U.S. senator.
As Trump noted though, Sessions did not have to recuse himself because the FBI had determined his contacts with foreign officials as a U.S. senator did not need to be revealed during his confirmation hearings.
It’s possible that, after the midterm elections, POTUS Trump may finally fire Sessions and replace him with someone he can trust, according to some reports.
“Clearly, Attorney General Sessions doesn’t have the confidence of the president,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., an ally of POTUS, has said.
Keep up with the latest about POTUS Trump at Trump.news.
Original article: http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/president-trump-the-fbi-doj-deep-state-is-a-cancer-in-our-country-and-the-tumor-must-be-excised-to-save-america/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=president-trump-the-fbi-doj-deep-state-is-a-cancer-in-our-country-and-the-tumor-must-be-excised-to-save-america
SHOCKING 57 MURDERS PER DAY IN SA PRODUCT OF ANC PERPETUATION OF “ENTRENCHED SOCIAL ATTITUDES”
These are the words taken from the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation which was contracted by the South African government to carry out a study on the nature of crime in South Africa.
The government has let everyone one down.
Mick Anell SA Minority Alliance
Video available at: https://www.facebook.com/SouthAfricanResistanceRadioTv/videos/305973030214485/
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
ROBERT A. HEINLEIN
“A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.”
— Robert Heinlein, Time Enough for Love
“Political tags — such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth — are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
— Robert A. Heinlein
(1907-1988) American writer
Source: The Notebooks of Lazarus Long
“Every Congressman, every Senator knows precisely what causes inflation…but can’t, [won’t]
support the drastic reforms to stop it [repeal of the Federal Reserve Act] because it could cost him
his job.” — Robert A. Heinlein, Expanded Universe
“Love your country, but never trust its government.”
— Robert A. Heinlein
(1907-1988) American writer
“The two highest achievements of the human mind are the twin concepts of “loyalty” and “duty”. Whenever these twin concepts fall into disrepute, get out of there fast! You may possibly save yourself,
but it is too late to save that society. It is doomed.”
— Robert A. Heinlein
(1907-1988) American writer
“Being intelligent is not a felony. But most societies evaluate it as at least a misdemeanor.”
— Robert A. Heinlein
(1907-1988) American writerp://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Robert.Heinlein.Quote.013F
“When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, “This you may not read, this you may not see, this you are forbidden to know,” the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything — you can’t conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him.”
— Robert A. Heinlein
(1907-1988) American writer
CENSORSHIP: The whole principle is wrong. It’s like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can’t eat steak.
— Robert A. Heinlein
(1907-1988) American writer
Source: on Censorship, in his book, The Man Who Sold The Moon, p186
“The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the greatest liars: the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.”
— H. L. Mencken
(1880-1956) American Journalist, Editor, Essayist, Linguist, Lexicographer, and Critic
“The government consists of a gang of men exactly like you and me. They have, taking one with another, no special talent for the business of government; they have only a talent for getting and holding office. Their principal device to that end is to search out groups who pant and pine for something they can’t get and to promise to give it to them.
Nine times out of ten that promise is worth nothing. The tenth time is made good by looting A to satisfy B. In other words, government is a broker in pillage, and every election is sort of an advance auction sale of stolen goods.”
— H. L. Mencken
(1880-1956) American Journalist, Editor, Essayist, Linguist, Lexicographer, and Critic
“Governments, whatever their pretensions otherwise, try to preserve themselves by holding the individual down … Government itself, indeed, may be reasonably defined as a conspiracy against him. Its one permanent aim, whatever its form, is to hobble him sufficiently to maintain itself.”
— H. L. Mencken
(1880-1956) American Journalist, Editor, Essayist, Linguist, Lexicographer, and Critic
“When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, ‘This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know,’ the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything—you can’t conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him.” ~Robert A. Heinlein, If This Goes On, 1940
“[T]here seems to have been an actual decline in rational thinking. The United States had become a place where entertainers and professional athletes were mistaken for people of importance. They were idolized and treated as leaders; their opinions were sought on everything and they took themselves just as seriously—after all, if an athlete is paid a million or more a year, he knows he is important … so his opinions of foreign affairs and domestic policies must be important, too, even though he proves himself to be ignorant and subliterate every time he opens his mouth.”
— Robert A. Heinlein
(1907-1988) American writer
Source: To Sail Beyond the Sunset, 1987
God Is A Racist And You Should Be One, Too
Watchman Mike Uncategorized September 20, 2018
Jews today are collectively, Satan. They run the world and deceive the world. They have publicly admitted that they want to end the white race permanently. They attempt this through homosexuality, mass immigration, abortion, birth control, and race-mixing.
Race-mixing, or miscegenation is known as the Doctrine of Balaam in Scripture, and it has been used against whites by the enemies of Yahweh for thousands of years.
Unfortunately, the Pagan/Jewish/Catholic (universal) whore and her harlot daughters (Protestant churches) have brainwashed the earth’s population with a false “religious universalism”, so that even the staunchest supporters of the “Bible” can’t even see the truth in the “Good Book” that collects dust on their desks. (((They))) preach that every thing on two legs is a candidate for salvation. However, Yahweh will not cast His pearls before swine.
The following are Scripture verses that prove race-mixing is an abomination to Yahweh. They will also prove that He chose the white race as His people, and does not care for other races. Yes, God is a racist. Because He knows they are His enemies, and ours as well.
Because most Bible versions are jewish corruptions, I have used some translations that are not in common use. However, if you look up the words in the original languages, you will see that the following translations are accurate.
“The man that shall MONGRELIZE with the woman of a man, or that shall pollute the seedline with the wife of his neighbor, let them DIE THE DEATH, the mongrelizer or SEEDLINE CORRUPTER and the female mongrelizer or seedline corrupter” (Leviticus 20:10).
“Let us purify ourselves from ALL mongrelization of the flesh and of mentality, fulfilling SEPARATION in the fear of God” (II Cor. 7:1).
“For thou art an holy (separate) people unto Yahweh thy Elohim, and Yahweh hath CHOSEN THEE to be a peculiar people unto himself, ABOVE ALL the nations that are upon the earth” (Deuteronomy 14:2).
“So shall we be SEPARATED, I and ALL of Thy people, from ALL the people that are upon the face of the earth” (Exodus 33:16).
“Neither shalt thou make marriages with them: thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son” (Deuteronomy 7:3).
“if ye do in any wise go back and cleave unto the remnant of these nations, even these that remain among you, and shall make marriage with them and go in unto them and they unto you: KNOW FOR A CERTAINTY that they shall be snares and traps unto you and scourges in your sides and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish off from this good land which Yahweh your Elohim has given you” (Joshua 23:12-13).
“For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the HOLY SEED have MIXED themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this TRESPASS” (Ezra 9:2)
“And the seed of Israel SEPARATED themselves from ALL STRANGERS and stood and confessed their sins, and the iniquities of their fathers”(Nehemiah 9:2). Note: “Strangers” above is from Strong’s Hebrew word #5236, “nekar”, meaning “a foreigner” or an “alien”.
“Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they SEPARATED from Israel ALL the MIXED multitude”
“They have dealt treacherously against YAHWEH: for they have begotten STRANGE children” (Hosea 5:7). Note: The word “strange” from is from Strong’s Hebrew word #2114, “zuwr”, meaning “a foreigner”.
“A BASTARD shall NOT enter into the congregation of Yahweh, even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of Yahweh” (Deuteronomy 23:2). Note: The word “bastard” above is from Strong’s Hebrew word #4464, “mamzer”, which is defined as “a mongrel” or person of mixed-race.
“Noah was a just man and PERFECT in his generations (Hebrew ‘to-led-aw’- DESCENT/ANCESTRY)” (Genesis 6:9). Note: The etymology of the word “generations” is obvious, as well: generations = gene-race-ions. The others were mixed or another race. This was the reason for the flood – to help keep the white bloodline pure (the flood was local and some mongrels survived).
“Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication and GOING AFTER STRANGE FLESH, are set forth FOR AN EXAMPLE, suffering the vengeance of age-long fire” (Jude 7).
“And Yahweh said unto Moses and Aaron, This is the ordinance of the passover: There shall NO STRANGER eat thereof. A FOREIGNER and an hired SERVANT shall NOT eat thereof” (Exodus 12:43,45).
“You shall keep My statutes. You shall not let your cattle breed with different kinds. You shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed. And you shall not allow clothing mixed of linen and wool to come on you” (Leviticus 19:19). Note: See the extremes Yahweh went to in order to teach separateness. By the way, the word “Holy” means separate or set-apart.
“And the MIXED multitude in their midst lusted with great lust. And the sons of Israel ALSO turned and wept, and said, Who shall give us flesh to eat” (Numbers 11:4).
“These SOUGHT their register among those who were reckoned by GENEALOGY, but it was not found. Therefore they were PUT OUT, as DEFILED from the priesthood” (Nehemiah 7:64).
“They did not destroy the nations, concerning whom Yahweh commanded them:
35 But were MINGLED AMONG THE HEATHEN, and learned their works.
36 And they served THEIR idols: which were a snare unto them.
37 Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils,
38 And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood.
39 Thus THEY WERE DEFILED with their own works, and went a whoring with their own inventions.
40 Therefore was the wrath of Yahweh kindled against his people, insomuch that he abhorred his own inheritance” (Psalms 106:34-40). Note: This is one reason why we are to separate from non-whites. Because they take us away from God every-single-time. Look at the state of things today. ALL of our problems come from jews, blacks, and other races (mostly secret jews).
“And all the MINGLED PEOPLE, and all the kings of the land of Uz, and all the kings of the land of the Philistines, and Ashkelon, and Azzah, and Ekron, and the remnant of Ashdod…….and all the kings of Arabia, and all the kings of the MIXED PEOPLE who dwell in the desert… Edom (jews), and Moab, and the children of Ammon…..Thus saith Yahweh of hosts, the Elohim of Israel; Drink ye, and be drunken, and spue, and fall, and rise no more, because of the sword which I will send among you……For, lo, I begin to bring evil on the city which is called by my name, and should ye be utterly unpunished? Ye shall not be unpunished: for I will call for a sword upon all the inhabitants of the earth, saith Yahweh of hosts…” (Jeremiah 25). Note: In anger, God contemplates destroying us along with other races because of our associating with them.
“A sword is on their horses and their chariots, and on ALL THE MIXED PEOPLE in her midst” (Jeremiah 50:37)
“Cush, and Libya, and Lydia, and ALL THE MIXED PEOPLE; and Chub, and the men of the land WHO ARE IN COVENANT with them shall fall by the sword” (Ezekiel 30:5). Note: Guilt by association? If we even enter into agreements with other races or mixed people, we risk suffering the same punishments as them.
“And as to that which you saw: the feet and toes, part of potters’ clay and part of iron; the kingdom shall be divided. But there shall be in it the strength of the iron, because you saw the iron mixed with miry clay.
And as you saw iron mixed with miry clay, they shall MIX THEMSELVES WITH THE SEED OF MEN. But they shall not cling to one another, even as iron is not mixed with clay” (Daniel 2:41,43)
“You shall therefore keep all My statutes and all My judgments, and do them, so that the land where I bring you to live shall not spit you out. And you shall not walk in the ways of the nations (other races) which I cast out before you. For they committed all these things, and therefore I LOATHED THEM. But I have said to you, You shall inherit their land, and I, I am giving it to you to possess it, a land that flows with milk and honey. I am Yahweh your God, who has SEPARATED YOU from the nations…..And you shall be holy (separate) to Me. For I, Yahweh, am holy (separated), and have severed (separated) you from the nations, so that you should be Mine” (Leviticus 20).
“You shall be holy; for I am holy.” (1 Peter 1:16). Note: Here is one definition of the word holy: physically pure and ceremonially consecrated (set-apart/separate).
“Do not through birthing become unequally yoked with those of a DIFFERENT RACE or with those without persuasion. For what communion does the law abiding have with law breakers? And what sexual intercourse does light have with darkness? And what agreement does the Anointed have with Belial? Or what part does one of persuasion have with one not of persuasion? And what agreement does a house of Yahweh have with idols? For we are a house of the Living Elohim, even as God said, ‘I will dwell in them, and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they will be My people.’ ‘Because of this, COME OUT FROM AMONG THEM, AND SEPARATE, mark off your boundaries and CAST THEM OUT OF YOUR SOCIETY, and do not have sexual intercourse with an adulterated MONGREL, and I will receive you.’ ‘And I will be a Father to you, and you will be a sons and daughters to me, says the Master Omnipotent’” (2 Cor. 6:14-18). Note: I realize this is very different from your King James Version. You can look up the words for yourself in a Greek concordance or lexicon.
“Parent all children separate from murmers and disputers, in order that they may be born perfect in our kind: PURE BLOODED and NONMONGRELIZED, faultless children of God, amidst a PERVERSE RACE, and HAVING BEEN CORRUPTED, among whom we appear like luminaries in the orderly arrangement” (Philippians 2:14-15).
“And when the Master your God shall bring you into the land into which you go in order to possess it
and shall remove great nations from before you, the Chettite, the Gergesite, and Amorite, and
Chanaanite, and Pherezite, and Evite, and Jebusite, seven nations stronger than you, and the Master your
God shall deliver them into your hands, then you shall KILL THEM: you shall UTTERLY DESTROY THEM; you shall
MAKE NO COVENANT with them, NEITHER shall you HAVE MERCY for them; neither shall you contract marriages
with them: you shall not give your daughter to his son, and you shall not take his daughter to your son. …
FOR YOU ARE A SEPARATED PEOPLE TO THE MASTER YOUR GOD and the Master your God chose you to be to Him a
peculiar people BEYOND ALL the nations that are upon the face of the earth” (Deuteronomy 7)
Even the Septuagint version of the Apocrypha makes it clear: (although most Protestants reject the Apocrypha).
“And thus the woman that leaves her man, and brings in an inheritor by someone OF ANOTHER RACE. First, she has disobeyed the law of the Highest, and secondly, offended her man, and thirdly, in her whoredom, she has mongrelized, bringing children by a man of another race” (Ecclesiasticus 23:22-23).
“And that he should PLACE STRANGERS AWAY in all their quarters, and divide their land by lot” (I Maccabees 3:36).
“But the multiplying RACE of the UNGODLY will not be of great number nor gain power through MONGRELS propagating, nor will that race be allowed to advance nor accomplish a secure foundation” (Wisdom 4:3).
“Son, preserve sound the health of your manhood, and do NOT give your strength to those of ANOTHER RACE. Seek out a field of good soil within the entire plain, and sow it with your peculiar seed, trusting in your GOOD RACE, so that your offspring will survive and, being bold in their good race, will grow powerful” (Sirach 26:19-21).
It is simply a fact that the Scriptures were written only to those of the White Adamic Race. Who is the Adamic race? Even with just a King James Bible and a Strong’s Concordance, anyone can answer this question. Looking up the word Adam in Strong’s, we see that it is from the Hebrew word aw-dam which is Strong’s number 120, and is defined as: “from 119; ruddy : “to show blood (in the face), i.e. blush or turn rosy.”
The only people who are capable of blushing, turning rosy, or showing blood in the face are whites. Additional research into the word Adam confirms that the word could only be in reference to someone of the white race. Also, we find that other people in the Old Testament were described in the same way. The Septuagint (Greek Old Testament) says this.
“And Goliath saw David, and despised him; for he was a lad, and ruddy, with a fair countenance” (I Samuel 17:42).
The word “ruddy” here is the Greek word “purrakes” and according to the Liddell and Scott lexicon, it was only used of red-headed, rosy-cheeked, white people. The Greek word purrakes/ruddy is equivalent to the Hebrew word aw-dam/adam.
Yahweh, our Elohim chose and established an exclusive covenant/contract with the White Adamic Aryan Hebrew Israelite race.
“And I will establish My Covenant between you and your seed after you, to their race, for an everlasting Covenant, to be your Elohim, and of your seed after you” (Genesis 17:7). Note: Yahweh has never called or made a covenant with any other people – only white Adamic Israelites.
The Everlasting Covenant was made only to the race of Abraham and his seed. When his seed becomes mongrelized, bastardized, adulterated, it is no longer his seed but a mixed-mongrel seed, and Deuteronomy 23:2 clearly tells us that mongrelized seed will never enter into the congregation or kingdom of Yahweh.
“But you are a CHOSEN RACE, a royal priesthood, a SEPARATED nation, a people for possession, so that you may speak of the virtues of the One Who has CALLED YOU OUT of darkness into His marvelous light” (I Peter 2:9).
“You [Israel] ONLY have I known of ALL the families of the earth” (Amos 3:2).
“Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say “and to seeds,” as though referring to many, but referring to ONE people, and to YOUR SEED, who are anointed” (Galatians 3:16). Note: most translations deceptively and erroneously replace the word “anointed” with “Christ” in order to spiritualize the meaning. There are hundreds of examples like this.
“I [Jesus/Yahshua] was sent ONLY to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 15:24).
“These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, GO NOT into the way of the nations, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL” (Matthew 10:5,6)
(Also see: Leviticus 26:12 / Jeremiah 32:38 / Ezekiel 37:27 / Isaiah 52:11 / Ezekiel 20:34, 41 / II Samuel 7:14 and 7:8)
If you are of the White, Caucasian, Aryan, Adamic, European, Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred peoples that populate Europe, North America, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Russia, etc., then you are Yahweh’s seed and probably a descendant of the tribes of Israel – the lost sheep of the House of Israel. Our ancestors were taken into captivity to Assyria and Babylon, and afterwards, rather than returning to Palestine, most migrated to Europe, Russia, and other places where many adopted pagan gods. These are the ones to whom Yahshua’s followers were sent, in order to tell them the Good News of the coming of the Messiah and the permanent establishment of the Exclusive Everlasting Covenant.
Even our white brothers and sisters who practice false religions and atheism, are in our family and the Covenant applies to them, as well. They will suffer for rejecting Yahweh and Yahshua, but they will all eventually be saved, because the Scriptures tell us so.
“And so ALL Israel shall be saved…” (Romans 11:26).
“For as in Adam ALL die, so also in Christ shall ALL be made alive” (1 Cor. 15:22).
“And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for ALL shall know me, from the least to the greatest” (Hebrews 8:11).
Yahshua Christ said that whoever breaks his commandments and teaches others to do the same, will be called the least in the Kingdom. Least in the Kingdom is better than the greatest in the lake of fire which Scripture teaches was made for the Devil and his angels – NOT Yahweh’s people.
So, no matter how difficult things may be in this life, be grateful that you are a child of Yahweh, and these present sufferings are only temporary. We will have eternity to spend with Yahweh, Yahshua, the angels, and all of our loved ones who have passed away. You were chosen by Yahweh to be in His family. Don’t have unnecessary associations with the other races who hate you, and please have nothing to do with jews, who are Satan’s biological descendants. Remember, with jews – you lose.
When the mass murder of 9/11 took place
what did the news media focus on obsessively?
What did they ignore? Details.
The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show (785) Dr. Peter Hammond – The Real Crisis In South Africa
Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Sep 19, 2018 The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show (785) Dr. Peter Hammond – The Real Crisis In South Africa2018-09-19T10:51:43+00:00ANDREW CARRINGTON HITCHCOCK SHOW
In today’s show originally broadcast on September 19 2018, EuroFolkRadio’s Andrew Carrington Hitchcock interviews Dr. Peter Hammond for a show entitled, “The Real Crisis In South Africa.”
We discussed: how we are witnessing the second phase of the Communist Revolution in South Africa; how South Africa won the final military battle of the Cold War back in 1989; how South Africans were betrayed by their own government when the country was handed over to Nelson Mandela’s Communist ANC in 1994; how Mandela’s successor Thabo Mbeki removed senior White people from important positions within South Africa’s government and infrastructure; how there are more unemployed than employed people in South Africa today; how since Mandela came to power in South Africa there have been over 700,000 murders in the country; the song, “Kill The Boer,” that Black South African Presidents have been filmed singing; how expropriation of land without compensation is outright theft; Theresa May’s dance with the ANC Communists; how the British Government are giving tens of millions of pounds to the South African Government, presumably to fund their ongoing White Genocide; how the White Genocide in South Africa is a testing ground for the White Genocide the enemy plans to implement throughout the world; and many other topics.
GOOGLE PROMOTES WHITE-GENOCIDE By Mike King
Article available at: http://tomatobubble.com/google_white_genocide.html
The biggest maritime evacuation in history
took place on September 11, 2001 in
It was handled by a spontaneous fleet of
hundreds of boat owners, large and small, who
rushed to help people in need without any concern
for their own safety.
I bet you NEVER heard about these unpaid
first responders before – because it doesn’t
fit the “government is god” narrative.
– Brasscheck TV
P.S. We can’t make this unique news
service available without the help of
Please consider joining the ranks
of BrasscheckTV.com supporters
It’s scary to admit this, but we were one
of the first – if not the first – to publicly
state that 9/11 could NOT have been
anything but an inside job.
We made that statement in writing
via email to the Brasscheck list before
noon on 9/11.
Why were we so sure?
Logistics. The world runs on logistics.
Nothing this complicated could have
been executed without extensive
planning and control over the operation
of country’s air defense.
Also, when we saw the early and well
coordinated media disinfo campaign
coming from all the television networks
we knew the event had to have been
(We were also the first to call attention
to the existence of “crisis actors” though
we did not call them that at the time.)
Copied all over the Internet, this Brasscheck
video has been seen well over 5 million
Hajo Herrmann (1913-2010) was an outstanding German Luftwaffe pilot who also distinguished himself during the Second World War as a courageous air force commander and innovative air defense tactician. After the war he built a new career as an attorney, and became known for his role in civil rights cases, defending patriots and so-called “Holocaust deniers” accused of violating German laws against free speech. Until his death at the age of 97, he remained steadfastly loyal to his people, his heritage, and the ideals of his youth.
After beginning his military career as an infantry officer, he was commissioned in the newly formed Luftwaffe in 1935. From 1936 until 1937, he was a bomber pilot in the Condor Legion, which aided the Nationalists in the Spanish civil war.
After the outbreak of war in Europe in 1939, he flew planes in the campaigns in Poland and Norway. By 1940 he was Commander of the 7th Staffel KG-4 combat squadron, and led many air attacks on England during the “Battle of Britain.” In February 1941, his group went to Sicily, where it flew against British forces in Malta and Greece. In one attack, Herrmann dropped a bomb on an ammunition ship that set off a explosion so devastating that it sank eleven ships and rendered the Greek port of Piraeus unusable for months. In early 1942, he was Commander of III/KG 30, which struck from Norway against Allied Arctic convoys, including attacks on convoy PQ-17
In mid-1942 he was assigned to the Luftwaffe Operational Staff, where he soon made a name for himself as a outstanding tactical and operational innovator in strengthening Germany’s air defenses.
In response to the ever more devastating attacks by British and American bombers, Herrmann created Luftwaffe night fighter attack squadron Jagdgeschwader 300, nicknamed Wilde Sau (German: wild boar), which used an innovative freelance fighter technique. Experienced night flying pilots and ex-instructors in Fw 190 fighters would visually “free-hunt” enemy bombers by the light of fires below, and with the aid of special ‘flare-carrier” Junkers JU 88 s following the bomber streams, as well as the use of the Naxos radar detector unit on some of these single-engined fighters to find British night bombers when they were using radar.
In December 1943, the 30-year-old Herrmann was appointed Inspector of Aerial Defense. By 1944, he was Inspector General of night fighters. At the end of 1944, he led the “9. Flieger-division (J).”
During the war, all Germans were targeted for death in a ruthless bombing effort that Allied authorities themselves called a terror campaign. More than half a million were killed, and many more were maimed or wounded. More than seven million were made homeless. Herrmann’s important role in strengthening his homeland’s air defenses helped to save the lives of many women, children and other civilians from horrific suffering and death.
As a bomber pilot, Herrmann flew 320 missions and sank twelve ships totaling 70,000 tons. He also flew more than 50 night fighter missions, destroying nine Allied bombers He was shot down four times, and wounded twice. For his valor and skill, he earned a number of decorations, including the Knight’s Cross with Oak Leaves and Swords, the German Cross in Gold, and the Iron Cross, first and second class.
At the end of the war Herrmann became a Soviet captive, and was held for ten years in Soviet Russian prison camps.
After returning to his homeland in 1955, he studied law and settled in Düsseldorf., where he worked as an attorney. He served as a civil rights lawyer in defending such “thought criminals” as Otto Ernst Remer, David Irving and Fred Leuchter, who were charged with violating German laws against free speech. In the case of Irving, Herrmann defended the British historian at no charge in three “thought crimes” trials, 1990-1993.
Herrmann was a friend of the Institute for Historical Review. On Nov. 8, 1998, he addressed an IHR meeting in southern California, where he provided fascinating details about his remarkable life, and insights into the climate of intellectual repression in Germany. On several occasions he sought help and advice from IHR director Mark Weber.
Herrmann was the author of two volumes of memoirs. An English-language edition of his memoirs was published in 1991 under the title Eagle’s Wings.
He remained active into the final years of his life, practicing law and addressing meetings.
Original web page: http://www.revisionists.com/revisionists/herrmann.html
Watch: Malema tells parliament to stuff their job, he will occupy the land, he can do what he wants and nobody can stop him!
Please watch video on: https://sa-news.com/watch-malema-tells-parliament-to-stuff-their-job-he-will-occupy-land-he-can-do-what-he-wants-and-nobody-can-stop-him/
White Farmer Who Is Set to Become the First to Have His £10m Game Reserve Seized Says South Africa’s Land Grab Policy Is Theft
Jamie Pyatt, Daily Mail, August 24, 2018
The owner of the first South African farm lined up to have his land seized without payment or fair compensation blasted the government today saying: ‘Whichever way they dress it up it is theft’.
Johan Steenkamp who co-owns a £10million hunting farm in Limpopo province, has been ordered to hand over his land, following a ten-year battle to stop the government buying it for a tenth of its value.
Mr Steenkamp says Prime Minister Cyril Ramaphosa’s plans of redistribution of white-owned land to South Africa’s black poor is just a cover so that the government can get their hands on valuable coal deposits found under his farm land.
The 67-year-old farmer said he is ready to defend his property by force if the government tries to take his land, saying; ‘If it comes to a fight so be it, I am not going to leave the country and I am not going to leave my farm.’
Mr Ramaphosa is trying to accelerate land reform to ‘undo a grave historical injustice’ against the black majority during colonialism and the apartheid era that ended in 1994.
Since the end of apartheid, the ANC party has followed a ‘willing-seller, willing-buyer’ model under which the government buys white-owned farms for redistribution to blacks.
However, Mr Ramaphosa now has announced plans to change the constitution to allow the ANC to take lands from white farmers without compensating them.
It has led to a tinderbox situation in the country, with many farmers trying to offload their farms or giving up and leaving the country. Many have headed for Australia.
They also face the constant threat of violence. Forty-seven farmers were killed in 2017-18, according to statistics from AgriSA, an association of agricultural associations. However, farm murders are at a 20-year low.
Despite still being locked in a legal battle to either keep their farm or receive what they deem to be reasonable financial compensation, Mr Steenkamp and his business-partner received a letter earlier this year saying they should get ready to hand their keys over.
This would make them the first white South African landowners to become subjected to Ramaphosa’s controversial expropriation policy.
Mr Steenkamp said that if the land claims court rules that he must accept a fraction of the value of the land then they are ‘up for a fight’.
He said:’I am not going to leave the country and I am not going to leave my farm. I am going nowhere. I will defend my farm and if it comes to a fight so be it.
‘I will do whatever it takes to defend my farm. I don’t want confrontation but the the Constitution says that I have the right to defend my property and my family and that is what I will be doing if anyone comes for my farm.
‘I will not be initiating force but my gates will be locked and I will have security here. If there is any force it will not be initiated by me.
‘If others use force and it starts to get out of hand then I will defend myself’ he said.
The news of the plans saw US President Donald Trump order an investigation into ‘farm seizures and expropriations’ as well as claiming that there was a ‘large scale killing of white farmers’ in South Africa.
Today, Mr Ramaphosa hit back at Trump and defended his new policy, writing in Friday’s Financial Times.
‘By restricting the ownership of land to a small minority, the apartheid regime ensured that one of the country’s most valuable economic resources would be severely underused.
‘This is no land grab. Nor is it an assault on the private ownership of property. Land reform in South Africa is a moral, social and economic imperative’.
Mr Steenkamp, 67, and wife Sanet, 53, bought 3,300 hectares of vacant land 21 years ago in Limpopo province, with plans to turn it into a thriving game reserve.
Along with business-partner Arnold Cloete they set up the Akkerland Boerdry and set out plots for the impressive construction of the 300 luxury buildings set on two thriving game farms.
They planned to give 300 jobs to local people but their plans were spiked after a tribe put in an application claiming the land belonged to them and Coal for Africa also tried to buy them.
Since then the Akkerland Boerdry have been engulfed in a legal battle to keep and develop their land but in March this year they were sent an unprecedented legal letter by the state.
It said their land was to be audited and valued and that the keys to the estate would have to be handed over within seven days and they had to accept any valuation given to them.
Mr Steenkamp says the Akkerland Boerdery is valued at 200 million rand (£10.7m) but they were only offered 20 million rant (£1.07m) – a tenth of what he claims is the true value.
However South African law gives owners the right to dispute the difference and reach a fair settlement in court but in a mortifying new twist for farmers this process was ignored.
The notice to quit was handed over late on a Thursday before a weekend with a public holiday on the Friday and a Monday which the farmer claims was a deliberate ploy.
Mr Steenkamp said: ‘It meant I had to find a legal advocate prepared to work over the public holiday and to submit an injunction on the Tuesday in the land claims court.
‘Fortunately the injunction was granted although the Department of Rural Development and Land Affairs are opposing it and we are waiting for a court date now to be set.
‘But make no mistake this was an illegal attempt to force us off the land and seize our farm without giving us the legal right to achieve a fair valuation as set under the Constitution.
‘We were forced by a court to allow Coal for Africa to do drilling tests under our land and they found substantial deposits and ever since they have wanted us off our land cheaply.
‘This attempted seizure of our farm is not about a noble attempt to redistribute the land to the poor of Africa but it is all about the government getting their hands on the minerals.
‘This is not about what is on the land but it is about what is underneath the land.
‘We have done our own tests on the land and we say the land is valued at R200 million but the Government expect us to take a tenth of that which make no mistake is pure theft.
‘There was absolutely nothing here when we bought it and the next thing we know a local tribe has put in a claim for the land and there is no evidence whatsoever to support that.
‘We fenced in the land and stocked it with animals and it was our plan to hire 300 local people to build a thriving estate in a game farm which would boost the local economy.
‘But then the coal company realised what we were sitting on and wanted our land for the minerals but they do not want to pay us a realistic price for the value of what we own.
‘We have so far spent 600,000 rand (£35,000) on legal fees trying to save our farm from seizure.
‘The situation is such now that we just want to move on as we have had enough and all we want is under the Constitution to go to court and as the law says get a fair price to sell.
‘For over 10 years we have been in a legal wrangle and unable to build the 300 homes for which we had bank backing and effectively have spent all this time without an income.
‘This is now an extremely important test case which will be heard at the Randburg Law Claims Court and if we lose, it means South African farmers have no property rights.
‘We have had to fight to get this far as we very nearly had the farm illegally seized but if the court goes along with the government valuation then the law is not being upheld.
‘The law as it stands states that the owner of expropriated land gets fair payment’ he said.
Not everyone has had the determination of Mr Steenkamp, and many farmers are now desperately trying to sell their properties.
Union bosses say a record number of properties are for sale but nobody is buying, making the properties effectively worthless.
Cattle farmer Jo-an Engelbrecht told the ABC’s Foreign Correspondent his farm just outside Johannesburg was now ‘worth zero’.
‘We had several auctions in the last two or three weeks cancelled because there was no people interested in buying the land,’ he said.
‘Why would you buy a farm to know the government’s going to take it?’
Some farmers are leaving South Africa all together, and heading for Australia, where Immigration Minister Peter Dutton ended up sparking a diplomatic row with Pretoria in March.
Dutton, a right-winger, said that Canberra should give ‘special attention’ to white South African farmers seeking asylum on ‘humanitarian grounds’ because they faced a ‘horrific’ situation.
This proposal was however rejected, with Australia’s Foreign Minister Julie Bishop making it clear that Australia’s humanitarian visa program was ‘non-discriminatory’.
AgriSA, a union that largely represents white farm owners, said: ‘What makes the Akkerland case unique is that they apparently were not given the opportunity to first dispute the claim in court as the law requires’.
AfriForum, a group representing South Africa’s white Afrikaner minority, has released a list of what it claims are 190 farms that the government is targeting for immediate seizure.
The South African governments’ Department of Rural Development and Land Reform has denied the validity of the list.
Article from: https://www.amren.com/news/2018/08/white-farmer-who-is-set-to-become-the-first-to-have-his-10m-game-reserve-seized-says-south-africas-land-grab-policy-is-theft/
Original article from: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6094565/White-farmer-set-game-reserve-seized-South-Africa-calls-theft.html
TWO HUNDRED YEARS OF M A R X
TRUMPET ISSUE 237 MAY 2018
In contrast to the hero – under God – for our first article we place side by side the name that has ornamented the history of disaster that has shaken Western Civilization to its core. Karl Marx. The article is from Ernest F. Elmhurst’s book “The World Hoax”
The man who originated Communism: Karl Heinrich Mordecai who later changed his name to Marx, was born May 5th, 1818, in Treves, Rhenish Prussia, of Jewish parents. His father, a banker, whose fore-fathers had been rabbis for 300 years, adopted Protestantism for business reasons, when young Marx was six years old. Marx’s profession of Christianity was nothing more than a gesture, a mere admission ticket to society. At heart he remained a thorough Jew, and from his earliest childhood his most ardent concern was his domination of the Gentiles – but called by him the emancipation of the Jews. For in spite of being a Neo-Protestant, he considered his new religion – and religion in general, the Jewish law excluded – “an opium of the mind.” Thus subscribing to the doctrine of the Illuminati, founded in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt, which secret society took a most prominent part in the French Revolution. Marx professed no allegiance to any concept of Christianity or Christian institutions, Christian society, or any nation built on Christian principles. Always boastful and of a violent temper, his persistent slogan was: “Whatever is, Is worth destroying!” As a Pretended-German, when travelling in Holland he was ashamed of his nationality. In a like manner, when he wrote of Germans in his letters from London, he always referred to them as dogs. On the other hand, it may be safely concluded that he would have spoken similarly of any nationals among whom he might have happened to find himself, just as he did of the liberal French. He was twice expelled from France on account of uncouth conduct, and particularly because of his typically Jewish behavior – always full of objections and contradictions, always at odds with the world.
The Prussian government lifted its restrictive censorship considerably in the year 1841, and Marx, viewing new press liberty as a springboard for the dreams of his race, he did not hesitate to take the broadest advantage of the new liberalism. He edited the Rhenish Gazette for some months, until the authorities were forced to put a stop to his outrageous writings, for he knew no decency in the use of language. His efforts to make an impression on his contemporaries turned out to be too provocative for the Germans, and he was ousted from his position in 1842. The next year he went to France where he edited a couple of numbers of his German-French Diary, until the French government in its turn put an end to his literary activities. It was then that his true psychology became known through the formulation of the nucleus of his Scientific Socialism. In this he received the fundamental fact, that his “scientific” doctrines of socialism, on which he was then working, were the basic requisite of a potential domination by the Jewish race. For he was aware of the fact that he needed assistance pf the working masses in order to accomplish this Jewish control, while outwardly he professed to have at heart the workers’ welfare.
In order to win the support of the non-Jewish working masses, it was necessary to begin making an impression upon them. This could best be accomplished by making them dissatisfied with their present living conditions, and by feeding them with theories of their alleged lifelong class struggle, with the intention of finally centering their entire thinking around this point.
(J. Soltin, a Jew, in a pamphlet issued by the Communist Party of New York, The Struggle Against Anti-Semitism, page 23, reiterates: “The working class is our strongest ally.”)
Therefor the idea of creating dissension among the non-Jewish population was Marx’s most essential concern. To build a wall of separation between worker and employer, by utilizing and encouraging every imaginable sign and shade of discord that might possibly exist – or could be created in relation to each other – and to use any real or imagined grounds for causing a breach between Gentile authorities and Gentile subordinates, these were the first principles around which he formulated his doctrines of “scientific” Socialism. Ult imately, Marx concluded, having all the working masses under the control of firm believers in his specifically planned Jewish theories, it would be easy to work out a system, under which Jewish domination would become an accomplished and enduring fact. For Marx himself emphasized that his proposed doctrines were intended to serve the Jewish race first, and, as is proven, thereafter the non-Jewish masses. As before mentioned, he had openly made the vicious statement that Jews must emancipate themselves first, before they can emancipate the ‘others’ – that is the Gentiles – Marx: Deutch-Franzoeshiche Jahbuecher – and this has been the pivotal point of Communism throughout its whole history everywhere! He never had a thought of emancipating the Gentiles – nor can one recall ay instance throughout history that Gentiles ever pleaded to the Jews to solve social problems within Gentile countries.
The conspicuous result of all this might be observed in the fact that wherever in the world Marx’s doctrines have been accepted, whether as Socialism or Communism, they have always worked profits for the Jews, but not for the gentiles. Those same doctrines, then in making, have proved themselves possible of application only in strongly Jew-penetrated or Jew-influenced communities, and have serves members of that race and their agents, exclusively, while their sponsors are even now promising to carry other masses of would-be Gentile “beneficiaries” towards a tragic fate!
When Marx thus laid the foundation of his “Scientific Socialism” he cunningly withheld from the broad non-Jewish masses the true purpose of his theories, through which, if applied according to his instructions, would come the desired “liberation” of all Gentile workers, after the Jews had first recorded their own “emancipation.”
Disregarding all principles of Nationalism, Marx’s socialistic doctrines were based upon Internationalism, because the Jews were internationalists and belonged to no land in particular, or rather to every land as implied in their plan for world-domination. In Lenin’ pamphlet On the Jewish Question issued by the Communist Party in New York, it is stated on page 17: “Marxism is irreconcilable with Nationalism”, and further, “Marxism puts forward internationalism to replace all forms of Nationalism.”
Marx’s expulsion from France in 1845 led him to Brussels where, in collaboration with his Fellow-Jew Moses Hess, and collaborator, Friedrich Engels, he drew up the basic lines of the Communist Manifesto which appeared in 1848. This, therefor, may properly be regarded as the composite expression of the leading Jewish minds of the time.
Since as has been shown, the complete control of the non-Jewish masses had to be Marx’s first step toward his ultimate objective – complete Jewish state control – it was essential to create a literature with the sole purpose of instilling and fomenting dissatisfaction with existing Gentile institutions and dissension, and class hatred between workers and employers.
The Gentile world was not intended to learn that the broadly planned revolutions to be propagated from one country to another, were meant to serve only the interests of the Jewish race. Therefor all this mad it imperative that the Jews in all political activities become and remain the actual leaders.
During an anarchists’ congress in Paris in 1872, Marx withdrew his support when it became apparent that its leaders would be Gentiles, therefor he refused to participate in this congress.
At the side of Marx, Engels and Moses Hess was Ferdinand Lassalle who as Lasel came from Poland to Breslau, Germany, as Chaim Wolfsohn. His father wrote a letter to him on December 7, 1806 saying “Don’t give up writing in the language and letters of our people”. Marx and Lasalle loved the idea of posing as the Messiah of the Gentile masses, leading to the founding of the Alliance Israelite Universelle in Paris. Adolphe Cremieux according to the London Morning Post September 6, 1920: “The doctrines of the Jews will someday cover the whole world.”
In 1859 Lassalle attempted to incite a war between France and Prussia through which he expected to actualize his plans for seizing by means of an uprising of the German workers.
Marx Communist Manifesto was compiled and written by order in 1847 of command of the international secret society then known as the League of Communists. The new “common enemies of the Gentile worker, according to Marx were the Gentile state, Gentile capitalism and the Christian church.”
In 1848 Marx sent an appeal to all the workers to refuse the payment of taxes in any form to Prussia’s king. When this failed he attempted the same in France. After being turned out of France he went to England and became absorbed there in his writings.
There he launched the “First International” in St. James’ Hall, London, in 1864. The “Second Communist International” was held in Paris in 1889.
Marx preached class-hatred among Christian workers against their Christian authorities. His Communist Manifesto declares “The Communists refrain from keeping their views and intentions secret. They openly declare that their goal can only be achieved by a forcible destruction of all existing orders of society. The ruling classes shall tremble before the Communist revolution.”
A London Democrat wrote of him: “He is laughing about these fools who echo his proletarian catechism. I am convinced that the most dangerous ambition – power drunkenness – has consumed everything in him, and the purpose of his scuffings is motivated in nothing but personal power.” – Der Schulungs-brief, Berlin, July, 1937.
The following letter written to Karl Marx by Baruch Levy reads: “The Jewish People as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will obtain world domination by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, by the annihilation of monarchy, which has always been the support of individualism, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this new world order, the Children of Israel, who are scattered over the world, will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition; and this will more particularly be the case if they succeed in getting the working masses under their control. The governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will, through the victory of the proletariat, fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which it is said, that when the Messianic time has come, the Jew will have the property of the whole world in their hands.”
(La Revue de Paris, of Paris, June 1, 1928).
N.B. In 1849 Marx was ousted for good by the Prussian government. He was thrice deported from France as an undesirable, He finally settled in London where he died on March 14, 1883.
THE SPIRIT OF THE BOER
TRUMPET P.O. 121, RONDEBOSCH
We bring to you here from the pages of ‘Commando’ the wonderful journal of a Boer: Deneys Reitz, writing at the turn of the 19/20th Century a thrilling drama of the Boer War that portrays the true spirit faith and courage of the Afrikaner Boer.
We lived in the orange Free State.
My father was Chief Justice in Sir John Brand’s time and subsequently, in 1887, was himself elected President of the Republic.
Our home was in Bloemfontein, the State capital, and here my brothers and I grew up. There were five of us, two older and two younger than myself and we led a pleasant Tom-Sawyer-like existence such as falls to the lot of few boys nowadays. We learned to ride, shoot and swim almost as soon as we could walk and there was a string of hardy Basuto ponies in the stables, on which we were often away for weeks at a time, riding over the game-covered plains by day, and sleeping under the stars at night, hunting, fishing and camping to our heart’s content, and clattering home again when we had our fill.
Sometimes my father took us with him on his long tours into the remoter districts, where there was more hunting and more camping and the great weapon shows held by the Boer commandos to do him honour. Our small country was a model one. There were no political parties, nor until after he Jameson Raid of 1895, was there any bad blood between the Dutch and the English. We had no railways and the noise of the outside world would reach us but faintly, so hat in our quiet way we were a contended community, isolated hundreds of mile from the seaboard.
In 1894, when I was twelve years old, we were taken to Europe. It was a wonderful experience for inland-bred boys to journey to the coast to cross the ocean in a ship and to see the crowds and cities of the old world. We went first of all to England where we stayed for a while in London, marvelling at the things we saw. Thence to Amsterdam to visit the senior branch of our family that had remained in Holland when our ancestors emigrated to South Africa long ago. The head of the old stock lived in a house on the Heerengracht; a wealthy man apparently for he kept many servants and had fine paintings on his walls.
As our republic had taken its name from the House of Orange, my father was well received by the little Queen of the Netherlands and the Court and the people made much of us. Next we travelled to Paris to meet Casimir-Perier: the newly elected President of the French. He took us to lay a wreath on the grave of Sadi Carnot his predecessor: lately assassinated by an anarchist at Lyons. From where we went to Brussels to see Monsieur Jesslein, our Consul. His house stood in the rue de la Blanchisserie and he told us it was one in which the Duchess of Richmond had given her famous ball on the eve of Waterloo.
We were presented to King Leopold an old man with a hooked nose and long white beard, who extended only his little finger in greeting, perhaps because we belonged to a republic.
From Belgium we went to Hamburg to take ship across the North Sea to Edinburgh and from there to visit the Cathcarts at Auchindrayne on River Doon. My father had studied law in Scotland and my grandfather before him had studied agriculture and they had both spent much time at Auchindrayne so my father wished his sons in turn to carry on the tradition of friendship, which for nearly a hundred years linked the two families.
My grandfather first went to Scotland in 1816. He met Sir Walter Scott to whom he took a lion-skin, which the poet Thomas Pringle had sent from Cape Town, and he became intimate with the great writer. In later days in South Africa, he loved to tell of their meetings and of the banquet at which he was present when Scott for the first time admitted that he was the author of the Waverley Novels. Both my grand-father and my father had returned to South Africa with deep love for Scotland and the Scotch literature and at home scarcely a night passed without a reading from Burns or Scott so that we felt as if we were among our own people.
From Auchindrayne we went to London to meet Sir George Grey, who was Governor of the Cape and had been a friend of my father many years before. My father used to say that if the English had sent more men like him to South Africa, our history would have been a happier one and although I was only a boy, and Sir George Grey a very old man, he made a deep impression upon me – a something of inward beauty not easily described but which I have not yet forgotten.
From London we sailed for South Africa.
On our return my brothers and I were received by our less fortunate playfellows like pilgrims safely returned from Mecca, so hazardous and undertaking did our journey seem to them in those days.
We took up our old carefree life once more, all unaware of the storm that was brewing between the White races in the Transvaal.
The Jameson Raid had not yet brought matters to a head, but there was trouble in the air. President Kruger and the Commandant-General Piet Joubert came frequently to Bloemfontein on official visits to my father, and we eagerly questioned them and listened to their stories of hunting and of the wars against the natives and the British long ago.
Sir Henry Loch, Governor of the Cape, also visited us, as did Cecil Rhodes, a big florid man who cracked jokes with the boys, but on whose political aims my father looked askance. These two tried to prevent the Free State from entering into an alliance with the Transvaal, but they did not succeed and a treaty was made with President Kruger wherein we agreed to stand by the Transvaal in case of war with England, a promise which the Free State loyally fulfilled.
My brothers and I did not understand the import of all this coming and going of noted men, and life ran on pleasantly enough until 1895 when my father’s health failed and he had to resign. We went to live at Claremont, a cramped suburb of Cape Town, greatly missing our horses and the freedom of our wide Northern uplands.
When my father recovered from his long illness we settled in the Transvaal where he soon became Secretary of State under President Paul Kruger.
My eldest brother aged nineteen was now sent to Europe to study Law, and after a while the rest of us were put back to school at Bloemfontein until the middle of 1899.
During our absence at the Cape the ill-fated Jameson Raid had taken and we found on our return that feeling was running high between the English and the Dutch; and even the Free State where differences of this kind had hitherto been unknown, there was so much ill-will that people openly talked of driving the English into the sea, whereas previously we had not given these matters a thought.
By July (1899) the situation had become so serious that my father ordered us up to Pretoria, as war with England seemed inevitable. We said goodbye to Bloemfontein, the town where we had been born and bred and where we had spent such happy days, and journeyed north, leaving behind us the peace of boyhood to face years of hardship, danger, and ultimate exile.
When we reached Pretoria, affairs were moving to a climax. Peremptory notes had been exchanged between the Transvaal and the British Government, and excitement was rising as each cable arrived and its reply was published. Already the Transvaal capital was an armed camp. Batteries of artillery paraded the streets, commandoes from the country districts rode through the town almost daily, bound for the Natal border, and the crack of rifles echoed from the surrounding hills where hundreds of men were having target practice. Crowded trains left for the coast with refugees fleeing from the coming storm, and business was at a standstill.
Looking back, I think war was inevitable. I have no doubt that the British Government had made up its mind to force the issue and was the chief culprit, but the Transvalers were also spoiling for a fight, and, from what I saw in Pretoria during the few weeks that preceded the ultimatum, I feel that the Boers would in any case have insisted on a rapture.
I myself had no hatred of the British people; from my father’s side I come of Dutch and French Huguenot blood, whilst my mother (dead for many years) was a pure-bred Norwegian from the North Cape, so one race was much like another to me. Yet, as a South African, one had to fight for one’s country, and for the rest I did not concern myself overmuch with the merits or demerits of the quarrel. I looked on the prospect of war and adventure with the eyes of youth, seeing only the glamor, but knowing nothing of the horror and the misery.
I was seventeen years old and thus too young to be enrolled as a burgher. President Kruger himself solved this difficulty for me. One morning when I was at the Government buildings, I met him and my father in the corridor and I told the President that the Field-Cornet’s office had refused to enrol me for active service. The old man looked me up and down for a moment and growled: “Piet Joubert says the English are three to one – ‘Sal jiy mij drie-rooi-nekke lever?’ (Will you stand me good for three of them?) I answered boldly: “President if I get close enough I’m good for three with one shot.” He gave a hoarse chuckle at my youthful conceit and turning to my father, asked how old I was. When he heard my age: “Well then, Mr. State Secretary, the boy must go – I started fighting earlier than that” and he took me straight to the Commandant-General’s room close by where Piet Joubert in person handed me a new Mauser carbine and bandolier of ammunition with which I returned home pleased and proud.
I saw a good deal of the President in those days as I used to go with my father to his house on the outskirts of the town, where they discussed State matters while I sat listening. The President had an uncouth surly manner, and he was the ugliest man I have ever seen, but he had a strong rugged personality which impressed all with whom he came in contact. He was religious to a degree, and on Sundays he preached in the queer little Dopper church he had built across the street where I sometimes heard him.
There was Mrs. Kruger too, whom I often saw with her pails in the yard for she kept dairy cows and sold milk to the neighbours. Once she brought us coffee while we were looking at a picture of the statue of her husband that was being set up on Church Square. The president was shown dressed like an elder of the Church in a top-hat and the old lady suggested that the hat should be hollowed out and filled with water, to serve as a drinking-fountain for the birds. My father and I laughed heartily on our way home at her simplicity, but we agreed that it was decent of her to have thought of such a thing.
I also knew Piet Joubert, the Commandant-General, for, apart from his visits to Bloemfontein, his son Jan and I were friends, and I sometimes went home with him to talk about the coming war; and his father was generally there. He was a kindly, well-meaning old man who had done useful service in the smaller campaigns of the past, but he gave me the impression of being bewildered at the heavy responsibility now resting upon him and I felt he was unequal to the burden.
One afternoon he showed me a cable, which he had received from a Russian society offering to equip an ambulance in case of war, and when I expressed my pleasure, I was astonished to hear him say that he had refused the gift. He said: “You see, my boy, we Boers don’t hold with these new-fangled ideas: our herbal remedies (bossie-middels) are good enough.” Another time, when describing the festivities at the opening of Delagoa Bay railway line, which he attended as Commander-in-Chief, he told me that when the Portuguese paraded a thousand troops in his honour, he had gone down the ranks shaking hands with every one of the soldiers. I liked him very much personally, and to me he was always kind and fatherly, but I felt that he was unfit to lead armies, and it is a great pity that a younger man was not appointed in his place at the outbreak of the war.
And now the days were speeding by and in September of 1899 matter had come to such a pass that British troops were moving up to the western borders of the Transvaal and Free State, and other troops were on the water, while large Boer forces were mobilizing on the various fronts. Committees and deputations from the Cape travelled up to make eleventh-hour attempts to avert the catastrophe of war, but it was clear that the die had been cast and that neither side was in a mood for further parleying.
My eldest brother (named Hjalmar, after a Norwegian uncle) was away in Europe studying law, and my father had already cabled him to return. My next brother, Joubert, named after the Commandant-General, was a year older than myself, and although he, too, was ineligible for burgher-rights, he intended volunteering for service, but the two younger ones were put back to school.
Joubert and I had made our preparations long before. Our horses were in good fettle and our saddlebags packed. My brother had a fine upstanding chestnut and I had a strong little Basuto pony, and were eager to be off.
Many of the country districts had been called up, but thus far no Pretoria men had gone forward. At last on September 29th the first batch from the town was ordered to entrain for the Natal border. The moment we heard of this we took our rifles, fetched our horses from the stable, and within ten minutes had saddled up and mounted.
We said goodbye to our stepmother and her children and rode up to the Raadzaal to take leave of our father closeted with the President and members of the Executive Council, but we went and when we explained why we had come all rose to shake us by the hand. The old President gave us a solemn blessing, and my father, who had not expected this sudden departure bade us goodbye in a husky voice and said he knew we would do our best.
From the Government buildings we galloped to the station where we found a great stir. Hundreds of friends and relatives had come to see the contingent leave, but in spite of the crowd on the platform and the loading of baggage and batteries, we were able to truck our animals after which we lent a hand with the stowing of the ammunition.
When all was ready the train pulled out to the sound of the Transvaal National Anthem. There were enthusiastic cheers and the waving of hats and umbrellas, and we were off to the front in good earnest.
As for my brother and myself, we were not Transvaal burghers, nor had we been called out for service, but we automatically became soldiers of the Boer Army by virtue of having thrown our belongings through a carriage window and clambering aboard little knowing how long and difficult a trail this light-hearted enlistment was starting us.
JOUBERT REITZ 1902 (BANNED TO BERMUDA)
“When the searchlight of the gunboat
Throws its rays upon my tent
Then I think of home and comrades
And the happy days I spent
In the country where I come from
And where all I love are yet
Then I think of things and places
And of scenes I’ll never forget,
Then a face comes up before me
Which will haunt me to the last
And I think of things that have been
And happy days that’s past;
And only then I realize
How much my freedom meant
When the searchlight from the gunboat
Casts its rays upon my tent.
UNDERCOVER IN ANTIFA: TACTICS AND MEDIA SUPPORT EXPOSED
August 17, 2018
See the video at https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/undercover-in-antifa-tactics-and-media-support-exposed/
ISSUE 12, FEBRUARY 1992: FINAL EDITION
The concept of Leaderless Resistance was proposed by Col. Ulius Louis Amoss, who was the founder of International Service of Information Incorporated, located in Baltimore, Maryland. Col. Amoss died more than fifteen years ago, but during his life was a tireless opponent of communism, as well as a skilled Intelligence Officer. Col. Amoss first wrote of Leaderless Resistance on April 17, 1962. His theories of organization were primarily directed against the threat of eventual Communist take-over in the United States. The present writer, with the benefit of having lived many years beyond Col. Amoss, has taken his theories and expounded upon them. Col. Amoss feared the Communists. This author fears the federal government. Communism now represents a threat to no one in the United States, while federal tyranny represents a threat to everyone . The writer has joyfully lived long enough to see the dying breaths of communism, but may, unhappily, remain long enough to see the last grasps of freedom in America.
In the hope that, somehow, America can still produce the brave sons and daughters necessary to fight off ever increasing persecution and oppression, this essay is offered. Frankly, it is too close to call at this point. Those who love liberty, and believe in freedom enough to fight for it are rare today, but within the bosom of every once great nation, there remains secreted, the pearls of former greatness. They are there. I have looked into their sparking eyes; sharing a brief moment in time with them as I passed through this life. Relished their friendship, endured their pain, and they mine. We are a band of brothers, native to the soil gaining strength one from another as we have rushed head long into a battle that all the weaker, timid men, say we can not win. Perhaps…but then again, perhaps we can. It’s not over till the last freedom fighter is buried or imprisoned, or the same happens to those who would destroy their freedom.
Barring any cataclysmic events, the struggle will yet go on for years. The passage of time will make it clear to even the more slow among us that the government is the foremost threat to the life, and liberty of the folk. The government will no doubt make today’s oppressiveness look like grade school work compared to what they have planned in the future. Meanwhile, there are those of us who continue to hope that somehow the few can do what the many have not. We are cognizant that before things get better they will certainly get worse as government shows a willingness to use ever more severe police state measures against dissidents. This changing situation makes it clear that those who oppose state repression must be prepared to alter, adapt, and modify their behavior, strategy, and tactics as circumstances warrant. Failure to consider new methods and implement them as necessary will make the government’s efforts at suppression uncomplicated. It is the duty of every patriot to make the tyrant’s life miserable. When one fails to do so he not only fails himself, but his people.
With this in mind, current methods of resistance to tyranny employed by those who love our race, culture, and heritage must pass a litmus test of soundness. Methods must be objectively measured as to their effectiveness, as well as to whether they make the government’s intention of repression more possible or more difficult. Those not working to aid our objectives must be discarded or the government benefits from our failure to do so.
As honest men who have banded together into groups or associations of a political or religious nature are falsely labeled “domestic terrorists” or “cultists” and suppressed, it will become necessary to consider other methods of organization–or as the case may very well call for: non-organization. One should keep in mind that it is not in the government’s interest to eliminate all groups. Some few must remain in order to perpetuate the smoke and mirrors vision for the masses that America is a “free democratic country” where dissent is allowed. Most organizations, however, that possess the potential for effective resistance will not be allowed to continue. Anyone who is so naive as to believe the most powerful government on earth will not crush any who pose a real threat to that power, should not be active, but rather, at home studying political history.
The question as to who is to be left alone and who is not, will be answered by how groups and individuals deal with several factors such as: avoidance of conspiracy plots, rejection of feeble minded malcontents, insistence upon quality of the participants, avoidance of all contact with the front men for the federals–the news media–and, finally, camouflage (which can be defined as the ability to blend in the public’s eye the more committed groups of resistance with mainstream “kosher” associations that are generally seen as harmless.) Primarily though, whether any organization is allowed to continue in the future will be a matter of how big a threat a group represents. Not a threat in terms of armed might or political ability, for there is none of either for the present, but rather, threat in terms of potentiality. It is potential the federals fear most. Whether that potential exists in an individual or group is incidental. The federals measure potential threat in terms of what might happen given a situation conducive to action on the part of a restive organization or individual. Accurate intelligence gathering allows them to assess the potential. Showing one’s hand before the bets are made, is a sure way to loose.
The movement for freedom is rapidly approaching the point where for many people, the option of belonging to a group will be nonexistent. For others, group membership will be a viable option for only the immediate future. Eventually, and perhaps much sooner than most believe possible, the price paid for membership will exceed any perceived benefit. But for now, some of the groups that do exist often serve a useful purpose either for the newcomer who can be indoctrinated into the ideology of the struggle, or for generating positive propaganda to reach potential freedom fighters. It is sure that, for the most part, this struggle is rapidly becoming a matter of individual action, each of its participants making a private decision in the quietness of his heart to resist: to resist by any means necessary. It is hard to know what others will do, for no man truly knows another man’s heart. It is enough to know what one himself will do. A great teacher once said “know thyself.” Few men really do, but let each of us, promise ourselves, not to go quietly to the fate our would-be masters have planned.
The concept of Leaderless Resistance is nothing less than a fundamental departure in theories of organization. The orthodox scheme of organization is diagrammatically represented by the pyramid, with the mass at the bottom and the leader at the top. This fundamental of organization is to be seen not only in armies, which are of course, the best illustration of the pyramid structure, with the mass of soldiery, the privates, at the bottom responsible to corporals who are in turn responsible to sergeants, and so on up the entire chain of command to the generals at the top. But the same structure is seen in corporations, ladies’ garden clubs and in our political system itself. This orthodox “pyramid” scheme of organization is to be seen basically in all existing political, social and religious structures in the world today from the Federal government to the Roman Catholic Church. The Constitution of the United States, in the wisdom of the Founders, tried to sublimate the essential dictatorial nature of pyramidal organization by dividing authority into three: executive, legislative and judicial. But the pyramid remains essentially untouched.
This scheme of organization, the pyramid, is however, not only useless, but extremely dangerous for the participants when it is utilized in a resistance movement against state tyranny. Especially is this so in technologically advanced societies where electronic surveillance can often penetrate the structure revealing its chain of command. Experience has revealed over and over again that anti-state, political organizations utilizing this method of command and control are easy prey for government infiltration, entrapment, and destruction of the personnel involved. This has been seen repeatedly in the United States where pro-government infiltrators or agent provocateurs weasel their way into patriotic groups and destroy them from within.
In the pyramid type of organization, an infiltrator can destroy anything which is beneath his level of infiltration and often those above him as well. If the traitor has infiltrated at the top, then the entire organization from the top down is compromised and may be traduced at will.
An alternative to the pyramid type of organization is the cell system. In the past, many political groups (both right and left) have used the cell system to further their objectives. Two examples will suffice. During the American Revolution “committees of correspondence” were formed throughout the Thirteen colonies.
Their purpose was to subvert the government and thereby aid the cause of independence. The “Sons of Liberty”, who made a name for themselves dumping government taxed tea into the harbor at Boston, were the action arm of the committees of correspondence. Each committee was a secret cell that operated totally independently of the other cells. Information on the government was passed from committee to committee, from colony to colony, and then acted upon on a local basis. Yet even in these bygone days of poor communication, of weeks to months for a letter to be delivered, the committees without any central direction whatsoever, were remarkable similar in tactics employed to resist government tyranny. It was, as the first American patriots knew, totally unnecessary for anyone to give an order for anything. Information was made available to each committee, and each committee acted as it saw fit. A recent example of the cell system taken from the left wing of politics are the Communists. The Communist, in order to get around the obvious problems involved in pyramidal organization, developed to an art the cell system. They had numerous independent cells which operated completely isolated from one another and particularly with no knowledge of each other, but were orchestrated together by a central headquarters. For instance, during World War II, in Washington, it is known that there were at least six secret Communist cells operating at high levels in the United States government (plus all the open Communists who were protected and promoted by President Roosevelt), however, only one of the cells was rooted out and destroyed. How many more actually were operating no one can say for sure.
The Communist cells which operated in the U.S until late 1991 under Soviet control could have at their command a leader, who held a social position which appeared to be very lowly. He could be, for example, a busboy in a restaurant, but in reality a colonel or a general in the Soviet Secret Service, the KGB. Under him could be a number of cells and a person active in one cell would almost never have knowledge of individuals who are active in another cell. The value of this is that while any one cell can be infiltrated, exposed or destroyed, such action will have no effect on the other cells; in fact, the members of the other cells will be supporting that cell which is under attack and ordinarily would lend very strong support to it in many ways. This is at least part of the reason, no doubt, that whenever in the past Communists were attacked in this country, support for them sprang up in many unexpected places.
The efficient and effective operation of a cell system after the Communist model, is of course, dependent upon central direction, which means impressive organization, funding from the top, and outside support, all of which the Communists had. Obviously, American patriots have none of these things at the top or anywhere else, and so an effective cell organization based upon the Soviet system of operation is impossible.
Two things become clear from the above discussion. First, that the pyramid type of organization can be penetrated quite easily and it thus is not a sound method of organization in situations where the government has the resources and desire to penetrate the structure; which is the situation in this country. Secondly, that the normal qualifications for the cell structure based upon the Red model does not exist in the U.S. for patriots. This understood, the question arises “What method is left for those resisting state tyranny?” The answer comes from Col. Amoss who proposed the “Phantom Cell” mode of organization. Which he described as Leaderless Resistance. A system of organization that is based upon the cell organization, but does not have any central control or direction, that is in fact almost identical to the methods used by the Committees of Correspondence during the American Revolution. Utilizing the Leaderless Resistance concept, all individuals and groups operate independently of each other, and never report to a central headquarters or single leader for direction or instruction, as would those who belong to a typical pyramid organization.
At first glance, such a type of organization seems unrealistic, primarily because there appears to be no organization. The natural question thus arises as to how are the “Phantom cells” and individuals to cooperate with each other when there is no intercommunication or central direction? The answer to this question is that participants in a program of Leaderless Resistance through phantom cell or individual action must know exactly what they are doing, and how to do it. It becomes the responsibility of the individual to acquire the necessary skills and information as to what is to be done. This is by no means as impractical as it appears, because it is certainly true that in any movement, all persons involved have the same general outlook, are acquainted with the same philosophy, and generally react to given situations in similar ways. The pervious history of the committees of correspondence during the American Revolution show this to be true.
Since the entire purpose of Leaderless Resistance is to defeat state tyranny (at least insofar as this essay is concerned), all members of phantom cells or individuals will tend to react to objective events in the same way through usual tactics of resistance. Organs of information distribution such as newspapers, leaflets, computers, etc., which are widely available to all, keep each person informed of events, allowing for a planned response that will take many variations. No one need issue an order to anyone. Those idealist truly committed to the cause of freedom will act when they feel the time is ripe, or will take their cue from others who precede them. While it is true that much could be said against this type of structure as a method of resistance, it must be kept in mind that Leaderless Resistance is a child of necessity. The alternatives to it have been show to be unworkable or impractical. Leaderless Resistance has worked before in the American Revolution, and if the truly committed put it to use for themselves, it will work now.
It goes almost without saying that Leaderless Resistance leads to very small or even one man cells of resistance. Those who join organizations to play “let’s pretend” or who are “groupies” will quickly be weeded out. While for those who are serious about their opposition to federal despotism, this is exactly what is desired.
From the point of view of tyrants and would be potentates in the federal bureaucracy and police agencies, nothing is more desirable than that those who oppose them be UNIFIED in their command structure, and that every person who opposes them belong to a pyramid type group. Such groups and organizations are an easy kill. Especially in light of the fact that the Justice (sic) Department promised in 1987 that there would never be another group that opposed them that they did not have at least one informer in. These federal “friends of government” are intelligence agents. They gather information that can be used at the whim of a federal D.A. to prosecute. The line of battle has been drawn. Patriots are required therefore, to make a conscious decision to either aid the government in its illegal spying, by continuing with old methods of organization and resistance, or to make the enemie’s job more difficult by implementing effective countermeasures.
Now there will, no doubt, be mentally handicapped people out there who, while standing at a podium with an American flag draped in the background, and a lone eagle soaring in the sky above, will state emphatically in their best sounding red, white, and blue voice, “So what if the government is spying? We are not violating any laws.” Such crippled thinking by any serious person is the best example that there is a need for special education classes. The person making such a statement is totally out of contact with political reality in this country, and unfit for leadership of any thing more than a dog sleigh in the Alaskan wilderness. The old “Born on the fourth of July” mentality that has influenced so much of the American patriot’s thinking in the past will not save him from the government in the future. “Reeducation” for non-thinkers of this type will take place in the federal prison system where there are no flags or eagles, but abundance of men who were “not violating any law.”
Most groups who “unify” their disparate associates into a single structure have short political lives. Therefore, those movement leaders constantly calling for unity of organization rather than the desirable unity of purpose, usually fall into one of three categories.
They may not be sound political tacticians, but rather, just committed men who feel unity would help their cause, while not realizing that the government would greatly benefit from such efforts. The Federal objective, to imprison or destroy all who oppose them, is made easier in pyramid organizations. Or perhaps, they do not fully understand the struggle they are involved in and that the government they oppose has declared a state of war against those fighting for faith, folk, freedom and constitutional liberty. Those in power will use any means to rid themselves of opposition. The third class calling for unity and let us hope this is the minority of the three, are men more desirous of the supposed power that a large organization would bestow, than of actually achieving their stated purpose.
Conversely, the last thing Federal snoops would have, if they had any choice in the matter, is a thousand different small phantom cells opposing them. It is easy to see why. Such a situation is an intelligence nightmare for a government intent upon knowing everything they possibly can about those who oppose them. The Federals, able to amass overwhelming strength of numbers, manpower, resources, intelligence gathering, and capability at any given time, need only a focal point to direct their anger. A single penetration of a pyramid type of organization can lead to the destruction of the whole. Whereas, Leaderless Resistance presents no single opportunity for the Federals to destroy a significant portion of the Resistance.
With the announcement by the Department of Justice (sic) that 300 FBI agents formerly assigned to watching Soviet spies in the US (domestic counter intelligence) are now to be used to “combat crime”, the federal government is preparing the way for a major assault upon those persons opposed to their policies. Many anti-government groups dedicated to the preservation of the America of our forefathers can expect shortly to feel the brunt of a new federal assault upon liberty.
It is clear, therefore, that it is time to rethink traditional strategy and tactics when it comes to opposing a modern police state. America is quickly moving into a long dark night of police state tyranny, where the rights now accepted by most as being inalienable will disappear. Let the coming night be filled with a thousand points of resistance. Like the fog which forms when conditions are right and disappears when they are not, so must the resistance to tyranny be.
“If every person has the right to defend–even by force–his person, his liberty, and his property, then it follows that a group of men have the right to organize and support a common force to protect these rights constantly.” —The Law. Frederick Bastiat Paris, 1850.
Read more at http://www.louisbeam.com/leaderless.htm
The official king of South Africa’s Zulu tribe has announced that that country was economical, militarily, and socially better under the white Afrikaner rule—and that history will judge blacks as only having destroyed everything that they had inherited from the white government.
Read more at http://newobserveronline.com/zulu-king-blacks-destroying-south-africa/
There’s “democracy” – rule by the people.
Then there’s “meritocracy” – rule by the best.
Introducing the dominant government
mode today: Kleptocracy.
The Magical World of African Journalism
by Jim Goad
July 30, 2018
Living as we do in a racist society that acts like white people are the greatest thing since sliced bread—even though everyone knows George Washington Carver invented sliced bread—we are often left with the impression that sub-Saharan Africa is a backward land of hopeless poverty and toddler-level superstition. Sure, if you want to get technical, the average IQ of a sub-Saharan African is a cognitively impoverished 68, but that can all be easily blamed on colonialism and white supremacy. Before the white man came and destroyed their advanced civilizations, sub-Saharan Africans were so smart that they didn’t even need things such as written languages and technology.
Sitting here as a white man in a white land on a shiny-bright summer afternoon, I was struck with a deep stabbing pain in my soft white underbelly to realize that my impressions of Africa had been spoon-fed to me by other white people and not by Africans—and I’m not talking about American blacks, because they don’t count.
“Why not let Africans explain Africa without the oppressive filter of Western constructs such as logic?” I thought to myself with a smug smile. “Surely Africa has a vibrant and thriving media that portrays African life in an authentically African way.” I smiled again, overwhelmed with my cleverness.
During my intensive research of African media—a process that took at least a couple hours—I realized that more than any other continent, Africa is a land of magic.
I didn’t pay too much attention to that ravaged continent’s political landscape, because African politicians seem to be the same as politicians everywhere else—one accuses the other of having a small brain, while the other counters that with all due respect, his opponent is the son of a dog.
I also sidestepped all the debunked and discredited tropes about Africa being a crime-ridden hellhole, because there isn’t a place on earth where women don’t gang-rape men at gunpoint, where toddlers aren’t found with their tongue and penis severed, where triplets aren’t born in a mall toilet and all of them die, and where men don’t chop their grandfathers to death with an ax for daring to suggest they get an education. We are all imperfect human beings, and not even Canadians, as wholesome as they may be, are immune to such foibles. Everywhere from Edmonton to Cape Cod to Harare, when men suspect their women of cheating, they smash out nine of their rival’s teeth with a log. From Manchester to Oslo to Nairobi, when lovers quarrel, they squeeze or bite their partner’s genitals in a moment of unbridled passion.
Speaking of passion, a stereotype about Africans that is often unfairly lodged against them is that they have very high sex drives and enjoy having sex with everything from hippos to tree stumps. What’s wrong with enjoying sex? Is somebody a little jealous, perhaps?
Via the inscrutable wonders of electronic media, Africans are able to reach out to one another and offer help and advice with their multifarious sexual dilemmas.
African journalists offer loads of sexual tips—both figuratively and all too literally—that may help you avoid becoming one of the 25 million or so Africans that are walking or hobbling around with HIV. We learn that “Vaginal odours are easy to treat,” that compulsive masturbation can be a problem for young African men, that you shouldn’t be alarmed if you have “painless swollen lumps” on your vagina, that it’s wise to keep your “hymen intact to avoid being labeled a ‘whore,’” and that, as Hillary Clinton famously reminded us, it takes a village to provide “Succour for baby without anus.”
But sometimes even Africans get carried away with their healthy sex drives, which leads to politicians busting through underage girls’ hymens with their fingers, criminal cases over forced vagina-shaving, and a preacher who calls himself “Jesus One Touch” denying that he could have possibly ever molested his daughter simply because his busybody of a wife was always snooping around. Yes, sad as it may seem, sometimes even African men of the cloth yield to the temptations of the flesh, resulting in regrettable headlines such as “I Sucked Pastor’s Dick” and “Pastor Taps Vagina.”
One thing I learned to my shock and awe while perusing African journalism is that when African men allow their enviably powerful sex drives to run riot, that’s when they start defiling people—whether it’s a 50-year-old man using biscuits to defile a 7-year-old girl, an adult male driver who defiles a ten-year-old girl on her way home from church, or a man who gets a long prison sentence for defiling an “imbecile,” African males in full rutting season are prone to defiling others, which is why more often than not, you may find them walking around with a “filthy penis.”
But what separates African journalism from the roving light brigades of reporters and truth-seekers worldwide is its unflinching, unquestioning, and deeply uncomprehending sense of magic and wonderment. Viewed through the eyes of Africans, Africa is one murderous, sprawling Disneyland.
Read more at http://takimag.com/article/the_magical_world_of_african_journalism_jim_goad/
KSCO Presents Georgia
With Georgia Peach
Georgia will entertain and inform you while she delights you with her Southern charm and sharp wit. She’s an unapologetic common-sense conservative who isn’t afraid to ruffle the feathers of the powers-that-be with her intelligent commentary and unabashed sense of humor.
Call in Number: 831-479-1080
More info on the radio show: http://www.zbsradio.com/show_detail/id/17
TRUTH IS HATE
Imagine, you pick up your phone to call your friend at which point a recorded announcement is heard:
“In a recent telephone conversation your violated this service’s standards. You cannot make or receive calls for the next 30-days.”
Welcome to the NATO West where freedom of expression is as censored as it was in the former Soviet Bloc.
I have three Facebook accounts, two of which are blocked at any one time, a situation that millions suffer from. This reminds us of our fate if we don’t act now. These sinister immoral bastards will as quickly shoot us as block us.
Facebook can dodge the bullet but it can’t avoid shrapnel and shot. The power of Fascism is shown in the FASCES symbol. It is easy to break one stick but many sticks bound together are impossible to break.
THIS WEEK I turned down two good paying ghost-writing orders from new authors. I want to focus on getting the truth out to as wider audience as possible.
I (we) thank those who have kindly helped us by buying our books, sharing our stories, and very important, donated funds to keep us independent. SEE TEAM WORK)
MIKE WALSH ROCKS THE AIRWAVES
CROATIA RETURNS TO ITS ROOTS
AFRICAN WITCHCRAFT COULD SAVE SOUTH AFRICAN FARMERS
Read more at:https://europeansworldwide.wordpress.com/2018/07/18/african-witchcraft-could-save-south-african-farmers/
Never Seen Before Footage (Full Documentary) Of The Reality Of #FARMMURDERS In South Africa By Carte Blanche [VIDEO]
So….. the video documentary by Carte Blanche’s award-winning investigative journalist, Devi Sankaree Govender about the reality of #Farmmurders (Genocide) in South Africa, that they refused to air, is posted here for the World to see. Please share, and share again!
Their slogan: “You have the right to see it all” is, according to them not applicable when it comes to facts about #Farmattacks and Genocide against whites! WHY are they sweeping it under the rug?
WE DO HAVE THE RIGHT TO SEE IT ALL Carte Blanche – WHY ARE YOU TAINTING YOUR REPUTATION?
Read more at: https://sa-news.com/never-seen-before-footage-full-documentary-of-the-reality-of-farmmurders-in-south-africa-by-carte-blanche-video/
The global news landscape flows so fast it’s like we’re looking at it from a train window. In terms of influence and story shares THE ETHNIC-EUROPEAN has passed globalist corporate owned state collaboration media.
Visitor and viewer statistics, a sharp increase in followers, story shares, ping backs, re-blogs, fuel an ever rising pinnacle on the user graphs.
The biggies take up our stories; we’re proud to our being partnered by Veterans Today, The Barnes Review, and Russian Insider. There was also the SPUTNIK International broadcast.
Amazon Books can best be described as ‘The Reptile House’ as there is just the occasional lifting of an eyelid. Against all trends, book sales are incomprehensibly down.
For our book printing initiative I have an acceptable price. The last hurdle is to get a reasonably priced carrier service that can deliver. Then, watch us go.
THANK YOU donors for keeping us going: Since last Wednesday July 11: Antonakis D (UK) Thomas H (Germany) Anna (Croatia)
CROATIA vs. IMMIGRATION 1 ~ 0
Please read more at: https://europeansworldwide.wordpress.com/
Russia Welcomes Afrikaners: 15,000 Boers Want to Change South Africa for Russia (VIDEO)
Whatever the outcome, the notion that Boers see Russia as a possible new homeland is telling and it is huge in its implications. White Christian peoples increasingly see Russia as their salvation
Andrei Martyanov Mon, Jul 9, 2018
Recall what I wrote on the fate of white South African population in March:
While blind and hypocritical West was hailing their thoroughly fake idol of Nelson Mandela, the Republic of South Africa was slowly being consumed by unprecedented black racism and non-stop assault on white Afrikaners. Rape, murder, robbery, barbed wire electrified fences around white South African communities–these are defining characteristics of modern South Africa. In general–it has NO FUTURE.
The expropriation of land from white farmers will be their death knell, literally. Like in Zimbabwe, they will be raped, murdered, pillaged and whatever else comes with Zimbabwean, now South African “justice”. The so called West, which still believes in own lies about South African “democracy” and benevolence of BEE (Black Economic Empowerment) and of ANC WILL NOT accept white Afrikaners when real white exodus starts, nor will the United States do so–the combined West prefers today anybody but white, predominantly Christian people.
The fate of Afrikaners is in question today and those people need desperately safe haven to start their lives over. Modern West is not it.
The delegation of Boers is currently in Russia, namely in Stavropol Region, and is discussing resettlement of 15,000 Afrikaners to the area (in Russian). The process is obviously not going to be simple–for starters there are very few huge land lots, which Boers got used to own in South Africa, in Stavropol. Boers love hot climate and, obviously, an abundance of the land, say in the Far East, is not going to work.
The issue of Boers’ Protestant faith, however, seems to be less profound because local population is generally positively inclined towards having Boers’ community and Boers themselves already stated that they are not going to be “enclosed” into own community.
Russians do care about peoples’ honesty and labor ethics first and foremost and Boers easily pass this test. The condition for Boers is, and these are not poor families, to have half-million dollars per family to invest into the economy of the region, which comes naturally once the issue of settlement is, well, settled.
Watch video at:
But whatever the outcome of all this is, the whole notion that Boers see Russia as a possible new homeland is telling and it is huge in its implications. It is happening, as I predicted a few years ago, that white Christian peoples (which is by definition–a European root) will increasingly see Russia as their salvation. That is why this Putin’s message at Valdai Forum last year was enormously important. Listen attentively again what he is saying both openly and implicitly.
‘A matter of life & death’: 15,000 white South African farmers seek refuge in Russia, report says
Published time: 9 Jul, 2018 12:05
Edited time: 10 Jul, 2018 11:42
© Eduard Korniyenko / Reuters
Watch video at: https://youtu.be/hqdyyHJb_SE
The new South African government, led by President Cyril Ramaphosa, has pledged to return the lands owned by white farmers since the 1600s to the black citizens of the country. The government said it is planning to put an end to what it calls the legacy of apartheid, where most of South Africa’s land is still in the hands of its minority white population.
Rights groups have said the initiative incites violence. There were 74 farm murders and 638 attacks, primarily against white farmers, in 2016-17 in South Africa, according to data by minority rights group AfriForum.
The farmers are prepared to make a contribution to Russia’s booming agricultural sector, according to Rossiya 1. Each family is ready to bring up to $100,000 for leasing the land.
Russia has 43 million hectares of unused farmland, and has recently begun giving out free land to Russian citizens to cultivate farming. The land giveaway program, which began in 2014, has been a huge success.
For more stories on economy & finance visit RT’s business section
July 8, 2018 Other Writers
. . . AND AFTER GERMANY, EUROPE
The writing is on the wall. The old Germany of our Christian ancestors is in the process of being destroyed. And after Germany, Europe is the target.
By PETRUS GERMANICUS and LASHA DARKMOON
THE TYPICAL EUROPEAN MALE IN 2050?
Published also on TRUTHSEEKER
LASHA DAKMOON (by way of introduction) : Petrus Germanicus (aka ‘Peter’) is an American of German ancestry who has spent a lot of time in Germany and witnessed for himself the tragic ideological debasement of the average German over the last few years. He is to be commended in particular for drawing our attention to the work of two well-known American polemicists, Jewish writer Theodore Kaufman (1910-1986) and non-Jewish Harvard academic Ernest Hooton (1887-1954), who shared one characteristic in common: a passionate hatred for the German people and a wish to see them destroyed.
Even more commendably, Petrus Germanicus has shown a direct link between the malevolent writings of Kaufman and Hooton and the mysterious Count Coudenhove Kalergi (1894-1972), the founding president of the Pan European Union which was to morph finally into the European Union (EU) and which is with us today and is responsible for the current migrant crisis.
The EU, as we all know who have eyes to see, has now become the United States of Europe in all but name — an undemocratic and despotic confederation of states without borders whose primary aim appears to be White Genocide, i.e., the slow and systematic destruction of the white indigenous people of Europe by means of uncontrolled mass immigration and mongrelization.
White genocide, Petrus Germanicus correctly believes, is taking place under our eyes right now. The process began in earnest in 1945 after the defeat of Germany in WWII, though the idea had been in the pipeline long before that with the arrival on the scene in the 1920s of an odd character known as Count Coudenhove-Kalergi, a half-breed aristocrat with an Austro-Hungarian father and a Japanese mother of samurai lineage — apart from other ethnically uncertain ancestors in his family tree, one of whom may or may not have been Jewish. If Kalergi wasn’t Jewish, he was certainly one of the world’s most ardent philosemites, literally worshipping the ground the Jews walked on.
Count Kalergi wanted the white indigenous people of Europe to disappear slowly (“soft genocide”) by interbreeding them with African, Asian and Middle Eastern immigrants who would be encouraged to flood into Europe in vast numbers, producing in time a coffee-coloured, mongelized race with negroid features. This carefully planned and coercive mass immigration would be accomplished only with the help of international Jewry, Count Kalergi believed. for two simple reasons: (1) because the Jews had most to gain from it; and (2) because the Jews in Count Kalergi’s eyes were an incomparably superior people, the spiritual aristocrats of the world who deserved to rule over the rest of mankind in a multicultural paradise without borders or separate nations.
The ideal state, the Ultimate Utopia, was envisaged as one vast confederation of states, all under the kindly control of a one-world government located in Jerusalem.
The Jews, seen as the natural born leaders and crème de la crème of the world’s intelligentsia, would be allowed to preserve their Jewish identity and monoculture, including their exceptionally high IQs, but all other races would need to be homogenized and standardized for the sake of convenience and efficient management. Everyone non-Jewish was to be popped into a metaphysical blender and turned into a mishmash of lower-IQ mongrels who would be kept reasonably happy as long as they did what they were told. There was no need to treat these non-Jewish mongrels — the New Goyim with the brown skins — inhumanely. There was no need whatever to treat them like slaves. On the contrary, they would be treated with kindness, in the same way as we treat our pets, provided they knew their place in the pecking order. The Jews were to be the new People Farmers. The rest of mankind were to be the Jews’ obedient and submissive livestock. It was as simple as that.
Read more at https://www.darkmoon.me/2018/genociding-germany/
Ethnic Cleansing of Whites in Canada
by Brian Wiggins
To millions of Canadians, open borders, globalism, diversity and multiculturalism are an existential threat to our sovereignty and identity of the Canada that we love and used to fight for. I have become, almost overnight, a demographic conservative; an immigration minimalist and a civilizationalist. I simply do not want my children and grandchildren to become a minority, a small part of a “gorgeous mosaic,” in their own homeland.
Liberals in particular, but all of our established political parties, seemingly hate this country and want to replace the historic Euro-Canadian citizens with foreign nationals. The progressive/left’s position on national immigration policy is centered around the concept that foreigners are inherently better than us. They want them coming nonstop. Don’t worry, they’re all valedictorians and future Nobel Laureates.
We know that Canadians cannot become Indian, Africans, Chinese or Sikh but we are expected to believe that anyone can move to Canada and become Canadian. If it’s not about “race,” as we are being told, then it is imperative that it is about “values.” Nevertheless, those illegal Nigerian eco-migrants that are storming our border, given the backlog, will likely be granted amnesty in a couple of years. Be advised that slavery is as much a part of modern Nigerian culture as female genital mutilation (FGM) is to Somalian culture. That’s vibrancy and enrichment, no question, but does it align with Canadian “values?” It has become unacceptable to demand that immigrants conform to their hosts’ cultures and so we are being made to conform to theirs.
Read more at: https://www.eurocanadian.ca/2018/06/ethnic-cleansing-of-whites-in-canada.html
Jamaican expats who retire there after decades in the UK face an “extreme risk” of murder, a former police chief on the Caribbean island has said, as official figures revealed that at least 85 Britons, Americans and Canadians have been killed in the country since 2012.
Senior police figures told the Guardian that returning residents were seen as soft targets by criminals and needed much more protection following the murders of three British retirees on the island in as many months.
Gayle and Charlie Anderson, aged 71 and 74, had only recently retired to Jamaica when they were fatally stabbed and their bodies burned following a firebomb attack at their “dream” home in Mount Pleasant, in the island’s Portland parish, last Saturday.